Helio G100 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G100 (with Mali-G57 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 18.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 301% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.4x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 575K
  • 48% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~30%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
575630
1948428
CPU 199433 623766
GPU 44194 596540
Memory 155279 331200
UX 176724 396922
Total score 575630 1948428
Samples [133 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1576
Multi-Core Score
2014
6239
Asset compression 99.5 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 50.8 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 67.7 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 38.9 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 61.8 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.54 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 17.3 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.88 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1467
12162
Background blur 2.2 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 1.08 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.14 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 251.1 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 19 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1346
Score 146 1346
Stability 97% 86%
Graphics test 1 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 5948
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Section 1 - 25 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 20 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10665
14015
Web score 10489 14034
Video editing score 6308 6661
Data manipulation score 7401 13175
Photo editing score 24558 23584
Writing score 12509 17637
Phones tested 14 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio G100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> vlaxxAnTuTu 12676283
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (vlaxx)AnTuTu 12676283
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Max)AnTuTu 12645861
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (V??)AnTuTu 12668364
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Muhammed Anas)AnTuTu 12696031
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G100 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 6 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture Valhall 1st gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 2 7
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 64 896
FLOPS 128 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 880

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 13 -
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 650 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2024 December 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6789H MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page MediaTek Helio G100 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Successor - MediaTek Helio G200 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (6.3%)
60 (93.8%)
Total votes: 64

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Helio G100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Sebastian June 24, 2026 at 09:15 AM
the g100 mid range is an even bigger joke
+1 Reply
Avatar
Ronin August 17, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Calling the Dimensity 8400 a midrange is a joke
+5 Reply