Helio G95 vs Helio G35

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Helio G35 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Performs 4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.7x) AnTuTu 11 score – 535K vs 200K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~32%)
  • Supports 23% higher memory bandwidth (17.1 against 13.9 GB/s)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2050 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G95 +167%
535127
200794
CPU 198562 98876
GPU 57845 12351
Memory 113958 52554
UX 164762 37013
Total score 535127 200794
Samples [24 tests] [2 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G95 +124%
672
300
Multi-Core Score
Helio G95 +126%
1908
843
Asset compression 93.8 MB/sec 60.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 50.7 pages/sec 27.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.8 Mpixels/sec 33.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36.8 images/sec 9.3 images/sec
HDR 61 Mpixels/sec 29.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.29 images/sec 0.88 images/sec
Photo processing 19.3 images/sec 6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 1.77 Mpixels/sec
Samples 16 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
2137
n/a
Background blur 3.45 images/sec -
Face detection 1.88 images/sec -
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 0.09 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 6.35 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 303.4 FPS -
API OpenCL -
Samples 7 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 177 -
Stability 95% -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 421 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Helio G95 +45%
8389
5781
Web score 6290 5814
Video editing score 6017 4869
Data manipulation score 6984 4106
Photo editing score 17761 9356
Writing score 9390 5944
Phones tested 3 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 51 FPS
[Low]
23 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 57 FPS
[Low]
30 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[High]
43 FPS
[Low]
Genshin Impact 27 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 52 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Low]
Device Realme 7
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco C3
720 x 1600
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio G95
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (rejaulakash)AnTuTu545523
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Rey Firmansyah)GeekBench CPU665 / 1754
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Stoic-saint)AnTuTu502377
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-24 (alvyan)AnTuTu545793
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-21 (Vadim250905)GeekBench CPU650 / 1574
MediaTek Helio G35
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-22 -> KILLERBOT2006CPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-20 (Meow cute)AnTuTu200794

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Helio G35

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2050 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 2.2 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP4 PowerVR GE8320
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue)
GPU frequency 900 MHz 680 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 24 8
Total shaders 96 32
FLOPS 172.8 Gigaflops 43.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 1.2

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU No
NPU theoretical performance 1 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1600 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.1 Gb/s 13.9 Gb/s
Max size 10 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 7
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2020 June 2020
Class Mid range Low end
Model number MT6785V/CD MT6765G
Official page MediaTek Helio G95 official site MediaTek Helio G35 official site
Successor - MediaTek Helio G99 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
225 (87.9%)
31 (12.1%)
Total votes: 256

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G35 and Helio G95, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!