Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 1

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (with Adreno 613 graphics) and Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~36%)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 568K vs 521K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  • Performs 47% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 201238 229840
GPU 46388 49950
Memory 157900 101579
UX 162869 140317
Total score 568395 521686
Samples [17 tests] [7 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 113 MB/sec 101.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 56 pages/sec 54.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 83.7 Mpixels/sec 79.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.7 images/sec 42 images/sec
HDR 72.7 Mpixels/sec 66.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 6.11 images/sec
Photo processing 22.8 images/sec 21.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec 2.84 Mpixels/sec
Samples 14 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 0.62 images/sec 2.15 images/sec
Face detection 0.32 images/sec 1.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.34 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 25.4 FPS 201.4 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 5 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 308
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9242 12259
Video editing score 4380 4529
Data manipulation score 7347 8023
Photo editing score 19716 23033
Writing score 13346 12626
Phones tested 8 models 2 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Sharwin)AnTuTu 12561406
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Googoo gaga)AnTuTu 11598730
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-21 -> LCSOnanoreviewGeekbench 6 CPU902 / 2038
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> LCSOnanoreviewAnTuTu 11618186
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-15 (Arun gurjar)AnTuTu 11531608
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-19 (RรธFรฎKรผL)AnTuTu 11584179
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-12 (Mark)AnTuTu 11403824
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-06 (Sean O)AnTuTu 11521686
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-15 (Chxp)AnTuTu 11523738
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-01-23 (Eddy)AnTuTu 11490749

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and Snapdragon 4 Gen 1

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A55
2x 2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A78
6x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 613 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 955 MHz 700 MHz
Pipelines 1 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 128 256
FLOPS 244.5 Gigaflops 358.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1200 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X61 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 900 Mbps Up to 900 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2023 October 2022
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM4450 SM4375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1723 (74.7%)
585 (25.3%)
Total votes: 2308

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Apus May 14, 2024 at 01:56 AM
NanoReview's SoC classification is a big joke. Saying 4Gen1 is a low-end while 4G2 is a mid-range, while 4G1 is a rebranded 695, while 4G2 is equipped with a clearly low-end GPU, just laughs at this classification.
+45 Reply
Serhii May 16, 2024 at 07:16 AM
We will definitely consider your comment and make changes if necessary. Thank you.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Mahyad irani March 14, 2024 at 12:39 PM
A newer generation and at least 10% difference? Not good
+6 Reply
Avatar
Agus March 13, 2024 at 11:54 PM
Are the 4th Gen 1 models supposed to be low-end, and the 4th Gen 2 models mid-range, even with a much lower GPU speed and only a slight CPU upgrade? What a joke!
+18 Reply
Avatar
Neo April 14, 2024 at 01:17 PM
Yes, if Gen 2 of version 4 was equipped with at least a GPU of 619, it would have been far superior to Gen 1 of version 4.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Sss August 29, 2023 at 01:14 AM
Gpu is very bad. It gives only a 60,000 score in antutu on the other hand 4gen 1 gpu gives more than 100,000 in antutu.
+133 Reply
Avatar
Zzz September 3, 2023 at 02:18 AM
Yes it true, sd 4 gen 2 is not good for gaming
+113 Reply
Avatar
Happy January 17, 2024 at 07:59 PM
Zzz, The 2nd generation Snapdragon 4 is not really a mid-range device, but the 1st generation Snapdragon 4 is regarded as low-end. The gaming performance is best in the 2nd generation Snapdragon 4 because it uses a 4nm chip.
+26 Reply
Avatar
Amish March 13, 2024 at 03:45 AM
Happy, Not really. The Adreno 613 is a clear downgrade compared to the Adreno 619, and that will be noticeable in real life usage as well. Plus, it is manufactured using Samsung's 4nm node, which is far less efficient than TSMC's manufacturing process. 4Gen2 is not an upgrade from 4Gen1 at all.
+13 Reply
Avatar
Pani June 3, 2024 at 12:59 PM
Happy, Though you have to consider whether 6nm TSMC fabrication or 4nm Samsung, it's up to you. Because you have to know who is best in making the best in fabrication node of processor and not to consider about the nm transistor size. ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ˜œ Happy.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Nobody222 May 25, 2025 at 02:43 PM
Happy, Wrong! It's efficiency eg battery longevity is better but not gaming with that weak gpu.
0 Reply
Avatar
Bababoi June 15, 2026 at 02:13 PM
Happy, Nope. Adreno 613 in 4 Gen 2 is far weaker than 619.
0 Reply
Avatar
Kane August 5, 2023 at 04:49 PM
Early benchmarks suggest the GPU is weaker. Looks like a downgrade to me.
+69 Reply
Avatar
Zzzz August 2, 2023 at 01:47 AM
Downgraded gpu? Then still lacking 4k recording? Or even 2k support?
+109 Reply