Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 1

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~20%)
  • Performs 20% better in floating-point computations
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 592K vs 521K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 229840
GPU 56314 49950
Memory 136317 101579
UX 161480 140317
Total score 592015 521686
Samples [83 tests] [7 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 101.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 54.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 79.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 42 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 66.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 6.11 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 21.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.84 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.15 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 201.4 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 308
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 12259
Video editing score 3911 4529
Data manipulation score 8663 8023
Photo editing score 18151 23033
Writing score 13129 12626
Phones tested 21 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-19 (RรธFรฎKรผL)AnTuTu 11584179
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-12 (Mark)AnTuTu 11403824
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-06 (Sean O)AnTuTu 11521686
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-15 (Chxp)AnTuTu 11523738
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-01-23 (Eddy)AnTuTu 11490749

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 4 Gen 1

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz โ€“ Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A78
6x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 700 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 358.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 900 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2022
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM4375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1301 (76.1%)
409 (23.9%)
Total votes: 1710

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mmmmmm... February 11, 2025 at 11:03 AM
Another rebrand of the Snapdragon 695 (the other rebrand is 6s gen 3). This one is just a bit downgraded.
+5 Reply