Snapdragon 695 vs Kirin 970

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 970 (Mali-G72 MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 10 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 26%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 470K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 970
  • Supports 75% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 17 GB/s)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2360 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
470805
CPU 237904 175802
GPU 56314 62679
Memory 136317 126756
UX 161480 105568
Total score 592015 470805
Samples [83 tests] [5 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
905
420
Multi-Core Score
2101
1617
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 87.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 53.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 61.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 16 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 62.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 2.91 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.52 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 970 +182%
3953
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 6.13 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 3.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 15 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 409.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
9496
6591
Web score 9704 5445
Video editing score 3911 5083
Data manipulation score 8663 5647
Photo editing score 18151 11646
Writing score 13129 6779
Phones tested 21 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
HiSilicon Kirin 970
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (tigersusyt)AnTuTu 11507642
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (DQP)AnTuTu 11492523
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-12 (Tran loc)AnTuTu 11460393
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-19 (Realalex021)AnTuTu 11470805
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-30 (danicabello2010)Geekbench 6 CPU422 / 1376

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Kirin 970

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex A73
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2360 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 5.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G72 MP12
Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 2nd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 746 MHz
Pipelines 2 12
Shading units 128 12
Total shaders 256 144
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 214.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 29.8 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3120 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- VC-1
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- 32 bit@384 kHz
- HD-audio

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2017
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SM6375 Hi3670
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site HiSilicon Kirin 970 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
71 (46.4%)
82 (53.6%)
Total votes: 153

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 970 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!