Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6020

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 530K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6020
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 207365
GPU 56314 44155
Memory 136317 133108
UX 161480 145955
Total score 592015 530583
Samples [83 tests] [5 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 98.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 52.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 69.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 39.1 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 62.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.96 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 20.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.9 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.9 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.94 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 3.62 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 218.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 134
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 7468
Video editing score 3911 5056
Data manipulation score 8663 6808
Photo editing score 18151 16809
Writing score 13129 10740
Phones tested 21 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
MediaTek Dimensity 6020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 (Abdullah)AnTuTu530583
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (tamas93tech)AnTuTu542327
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-08 (ShaqiL)AnTuTu527185
πŸ“˜ 2024-12-27 (sagar)GeekBench CPU697 / 1606
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-02 (Kazuha)GeekBench GPU1275

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 6020

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 March 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6833
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6020 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2480 (54.1%)
2102 (45.9%)
Total votes: 4582

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6020 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Vishal August 1, 2024 at 07:30 AM
Dimensity 6020 is far superior than sd 695 ... Sd 695 heats too much can't resist the heat emulsion and lags too much ....so mediatek is better in any ways ... always πŸ‘ŒπŸ†—
+11 Reply
Avatar
Shubham October 24, 2024 at 07:03 AM
You are absolutely right
+1 Reply
Avatar
Anonomynous June 3, 2024 at 02:46 AM
I have a mobile with Dimensity 6020, but it heats up too much - literally too much, 42 degrees on normal use and 45-47 degrees during gaming. It's like the second Exynos, so I recommend SD. I play 2K video on my mobile but it does not work properly.
+19 Reply
Avatar
Dhairya Wadhwani February 11, 2024 at 07:23 AM
Although the 695 model may be slightly superior, Dimensity is greatly underrated compared to it, particularly given the 695's current bad reputation from being overused by companies. This allows you to secure better deals on DM6020 phones, while compromising minimally.
+29 Reply
Avatar
Ahmad August 15, 2023 at 05:47 PM
Why are people voting for 6020? 695 has better antutu scores and better CPU and gpu.
+487 Reply
Avatar
Hemanth December 25, 2023 at 07:17 AM
The 6020 is more budget-friendly and involves very few compromises when compared to the 695.
+71 Reply
Avatar
Narayan Sharma January 30, 2024 at 05:48 AM
Hemanth, In the early era, Dimensity was used for testing only. Snapdragon met all qualifications early on. At that time, it was known as Qualcomm Snapdragon. Throughout time, Qualcomm has been the best all-rounder. However, currently, some processors excel in Dimensity.
+26 Reply
Avatar
... February 17, 2024 at 02:38 AM
Since MediaTek supports 2K video capture and playback, it may not be stellar, but it's superior to the 695.
+37 Reply