Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 900

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 900 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 87% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 900
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score – 671K vs 592K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
671241
CPU 237904 266132
GPU 56314 71827
Memory 136317 150753
UX 161480 182529
Total score 592015 671241
Samples [83 tests] [4 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2423
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 120 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 64.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 73.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 45.3 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 76.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 7.34 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 21.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 3.23 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
2362
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 3.56 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.74 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 7.08 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 403.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 228
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 609
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14320
Web score 9704 13144
Video editing score 3911 8031
Data manipulation score 8663 9360
Photo editing score 18151 30860
Writing score 13129 19188
Phones tested 21 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
MediaTek Dimensity 900
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (CaRi1306)AnTuTu634075
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Jeans)AnTuTu709600
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-10 (Arun)AnTuTu595729
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-23 (Adit Tia Pratama)AnTuTu671241
πŸ“˜ 2024-04-07 (Vishnu)GeekBench CPU846 / 3076

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 900

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 900 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 230.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 3.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s -
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 May 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6877
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 900 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
885 (20.8%)
3375 (79.2%)
Total votes: 4260

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 900 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jmz February 3, 2025 at 06:57 PM
Im using Snapdragon 695 is so cool temperatures unlike to mediatek tsssk so worst performance
+2 Reply
Avatar
Guest March 10, 2023 at 09:00 PM
Dimensity has more of heating and inconsistent performance.
+272 Reply
Avatar
Bork April 26, 2024 at 07:39 PM
Absolutely none of that. What you are saying is based on fiction. I been using the chipset for 1 year.
+14 Reply
Avatar
Matthew May 29, 2024 at 09:03 PM
Bork, I think Guest's statements about the heating facts are true. I was just watching YouTube without anything running in the background, and the battery temperature rose to 43Β°C afterwards.
0 Reply
Avatar
Bork June 30, 2024 at 11:58 AM
Matthew, Battery temp is not the same as cpu temp. Even if the chipset reaches temps in the region of 45 Β°C , that is a long way from overheating.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Bork June 30, 2024 at 12:08 PM
Matthew, battery temp in the region of 43Β°C doesn't necessarily mean the chipset is overheating.
+4 Reply