Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 920 โ€“ what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 920

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 920
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 920

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 920 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (7)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 77% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 920
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 27%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 750K vs 592K
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 920

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695
592015
Dimensity 920 +27%
750481
CPU 237904 290440
GPU 56314 78028
Memory 136317 150165
UX 161480 231848
Total score 592015 750481
Samples [83 tests] [10 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 695
2101
Dimensity 920 +10%
2318
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 117.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 61.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 78.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 43.5 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 72.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 6.73 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 3.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 695
1403
Dimensity 920 +62%
2269
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.95 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.44 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 6.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 385.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 232
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 633
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Dimensity 920 +41%
13347
Web score 9704 10805
Video editing score 3911 6810
Data manipulation score 8663 8454
Photo editing score 18151 34185
Writing score 13129 16317
Phones tested 21 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 64 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 59 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 68 FPS
[Medium]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 46 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Dimensity 920
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Hard)AnTuTu 11767408
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-03 (รbcd)Geekbench 6 GPU2269
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-03 (รbcd)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2318
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-03 (รbcd)AnTuTu 11745837
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-05 (Anerierisa)AnTuTu 11750481
Add View all (16)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 920

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz โ€“ Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.5 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 August 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6877T
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1256 (12.7%)
8595 (87.3%)
Total votes: 9851

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (3)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (3)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (22)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 920 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Tay Heroshi November 26, 2023 at 06:51 PM
I am a proud owner of a Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G device (Pissarropro). It initially came with a China stable ROM, but I switched it to the latest global version, MIUI 14, Android 13, by unlocking the bootloader. I hope to use this phone for more than a year. Though there's a slight battery drain while playing Genshin Impact in normal graphics mode, and it does heat up a little, it isn't too terrible. While playing MLBB, I haven't experienced any issues. In my opinion, I believe the Dimensity 920 might be better than the 695.
+19 Reply
Avatar
Abrar June 26, 2023 at 08:54 AM
I believe there should be a section dedicated to addressing overheating issues. I suggest this because I own a Xiaomi 11i on which I frequently play BGMI at a smooth 60fps. However, the phone heats up excessively, to the point where I feel like something is not right, even if I've only been playing for 5 minutes. This is probably the only issue I've encountered with this processor. Other than this, it's a fantastic processor and I would definitely recommend it.
+74 Reply
Avatar
Sallodhi March 16, 2023 at 02:47 PM
Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Dimensity. It's high time to end this.
+207 Reply
Avatar
Khaos September 28, 2024 at 12:17 PM
Couldn't agree more with you. With ARM already releasing what seems to be the source code for the Mali GPU series, the day that they release the drivers for the Immortalis GPUs, combined with phone manufacturers now promising much longer software support for their phones, is the day Qualcomm finally meets its match
0 Reply
Avatar
Neymar bro March 14, 2023 at 01:46 AM
I would recommend going for MediaTek processors as they provide a better experience than Snapdragon. I had a Realme Narzo 10 with 4/128 GB and played Free Fire and PUBG, and it was very smooth. Then I switched to Oppo A96 which has Snapdragon 680, and it was terrible. When I played Free Fire Max on ultra graphics, it lagged a lot. So, I switched to the Infinix Zero 20 2023, which has Dimensity 920, and it was a great decision.
+157 Reply
Avatar
Kauรงuk September 28, 2024 at 10:04 AM
SD680 is a budget chip while D920 is midrange. Why even compare
+1 Reply
Avatar
Jotaro October 2, 2024 at 12:00 AM
Kauรงuk, So true bro. He is comparing a low end sd 680 to a dimensity 920 LMFAO XD XD its like comparing a poor man's oatmeal to a 5 Star Steak XD
0 Reply
Englishะ ัƒััะบะธะน