Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 920

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 920 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 920
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 41% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 10 score – 534K vs 439K
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2200 MHz)
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
534117
CPU 153615 163969
GPU 81726 115339
Memory 97539 111843
UX 106511 139992
Total score 439495 534117

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 106.3 MB/sec 116.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 58.3 pages/sec 60.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 79.4 Mpixels/sec 85.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 43.4 images/sec 45.8 images/sec
HDR 68.1 Mpixels/sec 73.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.37 images/sec 6.59 images/sec
Photo processing 20.9 images/sec 14.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 3.29 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
2393
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
2269
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 7 FPS 13 FPS
Score 1201 2269

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
64 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
59 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
68 FPS
[Medium]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
46 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
53 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 920

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 2 4
Shading units 128 -
Total shaders 256 -
FLOPS 486.4 Gigaflops 684 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 August 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6877T
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1074 (12.3%)
7685 (87.7%)
Total votes: 8759

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 920 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Avatar
Abrar 26 June 2023 08:54
I believe there should be a section dedicated to addressing overheating issues. I suggest this because I own a Xiaomi 11i on which I frequently play BGMI at a smooth 60fps. However, the phone heats up excessively, to the point where I feel like something is not right, even if I've only been playing for 5 minutes. This is probably the only issue I've encountered with this processor. Other than this, it's a fantastic processor and I would definitely recommend it.
+53 Reply
Avatar
Sallodhi 16 March 2023 14:47
Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Dimensity. It's high time to end this.
+177 Reply
Avatar
Neymar bro 14 March 2023 01:46
I would recommend going for MediaTek processors as they provide a better experience than Snapdragon. I had a Realme Narzo 10 with 4/128 GB and played Free Fire and PUBG, and it was very smooth. Then I switched to Oppo A96 which has Snapdragon 680, and it was terrible. When I played Free Fire Max on ultra graphics, it lagged a lot. So, I switched to the Infinix Zero 20 2023, which has Dimensity 920, and it was a great decision.
+107 Reply
Promotion