Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 680 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 680

Snapdragon 695
VS
Snapdragon 680
Snapdragon 695
Snapdragon 680

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v10
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (1)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 71% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 42%) AnTuTu 10 score – 435K vs 306K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Snapdragon 680

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +42%
435422
Snapdragon 680
306817
CPU 153615 108793
GPU 81726 48003
Memory 97539 88540
UX 106511 64306
Total score 435422 306817
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 106.3 MB/sec 90 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 58.3 pages/sec 46.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 79.4 Mpixels/sec 64.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 43.4 images/sec 16.3 images/sec
HDR 68.1 Mpixels/sec 51.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.37 images/sec 3.06 images/sec
Photo processing 20.9 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 2.52 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 99% 90%
Graphics test 7 FPS 2 FPS
Score 1201 441

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 59 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 23 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 65 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 62 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 54 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 950 MHz 1110 MHz
Execution units 2 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 486.4 Gigaflops 284 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM6225
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3084 (80.7%)
736 (19.3%)
Total votes: 3820

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
2. MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3. MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
4. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
5. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6. MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8. MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
10. MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Compare other chipsets (160+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Avatar
ReCursive 24 June 2022 23:28
Can anyone explain these single core results to me please . I'm completely confused by them :|
+173 Reply
Avatar
Andreas 11 September 2022 13:24
A processor has 8 cores. Single core performance is the performance of one core, multicore performance is the performance of all cpu cores combined.
+82 Reply
Avatar
Boiboi 15 December 2022 15:01
Many (or most) applications are incapable of effectively using several cores. A lot of loads is usually placed on a single core. So single-core performance is important to consider when looking at CPU performance and should be looked at with multi-core in order to make a good judgment on the chip's performance.
+57 Reply
Promotion
EnglishРусский