Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 680 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 680

Snapdragon 695
VS
Snapdragon 680
Snapdragon 695
Snapdragon 680

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 51% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 40%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 424K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Higher GPU frequency (~33%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Snapdragon 680

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +40%
592015
Snapdragon 680
424216
CPU 237904 185604
GPU 56314 26544
Memory 136317 114814
UX 161480 97254
Total score 592015 424216
Samples [83 tests] [82 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 85.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 43.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 59.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 49.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.59 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 35 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 0.32 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.16 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 1.48 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 26.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 20 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 172
Stability 98% 97%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 7531
Video editing score 3911 4072
Data manipulation score 8663 6097
Photo editing score 18151 14785
Writing score 13129 8535
Phones tested 21 models 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 59 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 23 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 65 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 62 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 54 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Croze)AnTuTu 12490622
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Arsts)AnTuTu 12516449
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 11426265
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ZION)AnTuTu 12514393
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (Raick)AnTuTu 12486423
Add View all (107)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1114 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 285.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM6225
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3845 (80.4%)
935 (19.6%)
Total votes: 4780

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (35)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (12)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G91 (2)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ReCursive June 24, 2022 at 11:28 PM
Can anyone explain these single core results to me please . I'm completely confused by them :|
+211 Reply
Avatar
Andreas September 11, 2022 at 01:24 PM
A processor has 8 cores. Single core performance is the performance of one core, multicore performance is the performance of all cpu cores combined.
+105 Reply
Avatar
Boiboi December 15, 2022 at 03:01 PM
Many (or most) applications are incapable of effectively using several cores. A lot of loads is usually placed on a single core. So single-core performance is important to consider when looking at CPU performance and should be looked at with multi-core in order to make a good judgment on the chip's performance.
+78 Reply
Avatar
areBhai February 23, 2024 at 10:55 AM
695 has a78 architechture, which is more modern and much more efficient than a73 that is used in the 680. Hence even with low clock speed the performance output of 695 is much better.
+23 Reply
EnglishРусский