Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 690

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 690 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~49%)
  • Performs 49% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 19%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 499K
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 205382
GPU 56314 52431
Memory 136317 78632
UX 161480 162595
Total score 592015 499040
Samples [83 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 96.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 50.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 65 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 38 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 59.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.13 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 16.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.8 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.52 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.64 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 2.92 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 165.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 -
Video editing score 3911 -
Data manipulation score 8663 -
Photo editing score 18151 -
Writing score 13129 -
Phones tested 21 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)GeekBench GPU966
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)GeekBench CPU780 / 1897

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 690

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 565 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 289.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 692
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 900 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 June 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 SM6350
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
536 (73.6%)
192 (26.4%)
Total votes: 728

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 690 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Kane Williams January 19, 2026 at 06:23 AM
Snapdragon 690 is way better, its not just about performance, its about compatibility. 690 can do 4K while 695 is stuck at 1080P 60FPS like how? So that means 695 is just a β€œgaming” chipset not a chipset for other stuff
0 Reply
Avatar
Ade January 21, 2024 at 04:27 AM
Has all this improvement been made while downgrading the ISP? Can it seriously handle 1080p at 60fps?
+21 Reply