Snapdragon 720G vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (with Adreno 618 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 14%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 517K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 218272 237904
GPU 50078 56314
Memory 103903 136317
UX 145207 161480
Total score 517460 592015
Samples [52 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 94.3 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 45.9 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 62.1 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 33.9 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 55.7 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.39 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 15.3 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.36 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 21 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.88 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 0.78 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.86 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 217.7 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 314 360
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 1 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8030 9704
Video editing score 6295 3911
Data manipulation score 7577 8663
Photo editing score 18039 18151
Writing score 9464 13129
Phones tested 6 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 43 FPS
[High]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Low]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 51 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 34 FPS
[Medium]
19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 30 FPS
[High]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Realme 7 Pro
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (masnung08)AnTuTu 12599693
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Aether2005)AnTuTu 11563764
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Joe_cool)AnTuTu 11504036
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-27 (Makasin0)AnTuTu 11624334
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (DarkELITECustom.PH)Geekbench 6 CPU751 / 1835
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 720G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 8 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 618 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 750 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 384 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 692 Hexagon 686
NPU theoretical performance 5 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - 384 kHz/32 bit - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X15 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2020 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7125 SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1566 (27.3%)
4166 (72.7%)
Total votes: 5732

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 720G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anon June 27, 2023 at 05:32 PM
Snapdragon 695 is already out-dated as it can't do 4K anything! What a waste of silicon.
+278 Reply
Avatar
Roshan March 10, 2024 at 03:53 PM
The 695 is primarily used in tablets that can deliver online classes for kids, accommodate medium-level gaming, and provide entertainment. Not everyone demands 4K resolution. If you're looking for performance, there are many other chips available. It's a cost-effective choice for those on a budget.
+75 Reply