Snapdragon 730G vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (with Adreno 618 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 533K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 221636 237904
GPU 49363 56314
Memory 101374 136317
UX 161257 161480
Total score 533630 592015
Samples [3 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 93.1 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 47.6 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 66.1 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.7 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 55 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.3 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 16.2 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.76 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 89 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.29 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 1.12 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 0.62 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 202.8 FPS 245.1 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples - 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 360
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 9704
Video editing score - 3911
Data manipulation score - 8663
Photo editing score - 18151
Writing score - 13129
Phones tested - 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 47 FPS
[High]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Medium]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 51 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 54 FPS
[Ultra]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
1080 x 2340
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-27 (Stanislavikkk)AnTuTu533630
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-02 (dapdep)AnTuTu506661
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 730G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 8 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 618 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 825 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 422.4 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 688 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X15 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2019 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7150-AB SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
392 (31.3%)
859 (68.7%)
Total votes: 1251

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 730G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
seemax May 5, 2024 at 07:37 PM
Looking at how those 695ers will be used in the 2024 Motorola Moto G84 really hits home what a massive impact Corona and the Russo-Ukrainian war had and had on the economy. My 2019 G9 Plus with its old 730G will still punch higher in weight against games and more than a phone developed 5 years after it, though intended to be in the same consumer range. Maybe in 2026 there will be hardware that will make an upgrade viable. Crazy, isn't it? Approximately 7 years of technological advance stomped into the ground by two semi-close events and their effects on inflation.
+13 Reply