Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 685

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and Snapdragon 685 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Performs 75% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 65%) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 476K
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.3x)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
783606
CPU 326426 185342
GPU 101452 28390
Memory 119484 135110
UX 236244 127333
Total score 783606 476175
Samples [113 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 97.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 29.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 56.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 51.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 2.83 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 30 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 0.34 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 0.17 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 29.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 -
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 8747
Video editing score 6994 4745
Data manipulation score 9642 7401
Photo editing score 24463 15136
Writing score 14285 10107
Phones tested 11 models 9 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 -> AbdullrahmanHAnTuTu 12724653
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Huybu)AnTuTu 12995795
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 -> FlopsAnTuTu 12895764
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 -> DuduSMistrzGeekbench 7 GPU1417
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 -> DuduSMistrzGeekbench 7 CPU874 / 2866
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 (Sakin Azad Duha)AnTuTu 12529210
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (Π“Π»Π΅Π±)AnTuTu 12568523
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Ahmad)AnTuTu 12572668
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> Hoangphi28AnTuTu 12546806
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 (Morteza)CPU Throttle91%

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 685

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 550 MHz 1260 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 128
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 322.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 March 2023
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM7325 SM6225-AD
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
290 (85.3%)
50 (14.7%)
Total votes: 340

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 685 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!