Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642L graphics) and Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (Adreno 644). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.


General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Performs 35% better in floating-point computations
  • Announced 1-year later
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 9 score – 560K vs 528K


Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 163415 177123
GPU 155279 162367
Memory 84153 101455
UX 129383 120496
Total score 528894 560577

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression 175.3 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 25 images/s -
Speech recognition 41 words/s -
Machine learning 36.7 images/s -
Camera shooting 34.6 images/s -
HTML 5 3.03 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 988.8 Krows/s -


A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 14 FPS 18 FPS
Score 2463 3097


Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
Fortnite 27 FPS
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.


Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 7 Gen 1


Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP 5 W 5 W


GPU name Adreno 642L Adreno 644
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 490 MHz -
Execution units 2 2
Shading units 384 384
FLOPS 753 Gigaflops 1014 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12


Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Yes
Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3360 x 1600
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV


Modem X53 X62
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 4400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC


Announced May 2021 May 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 SM7450-AB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
521 (28%)
1341 (72%)
Total votes: 1862


Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
Abducted2005 10 July 2022 18:45
Hate to break it to u all but the 778g/778g+ fabbed by tsmc will come out on top because Samsungs 4nm node isn't great its about equal to tsmc 5nm or 6nm and because of all the heat Samsung fabbed chips generate the sustainable performance of tsmc's node will win as it always does. Samsung may have been first to 3nm but it's not the better nor does it have tsmc's track record. Honestly, Samsung should collaborate with tsmc to find out what it's doing so wrong with its nodes because other than memory and baseband chips customers are running away for more than one reason. 1 heat 2 crap yields 3 density 4 customer satisfaction 5 unsustainable performance.
+43 Reply
damnright 30 July 2022 09:59
Or Samsung can just poach TSMC engineers and steal TSMC's Intellectual property and designs like it has been doing till now.
+13 Reply
Fun 22 June 2022 19:43
You can't trust any Qualcomm new chip anymore they need to get to the line again 👍
+18 Reply
Abducted2005 10 July 2022 18:47
Correction you can't trust any new Samsung fabbed chip. In fact, if tsmc fabbed the baseband x60 we would get better efficiency and sustainable internet connection.
+18 Reply
Truth 13 June 2022 09:29
The benchmark of 7 gen 1 is preliminary testing, hope people don't jump to conclusions instantly, clock speed of cpus is 98% the same.
+24 Reply
Xavier 22 June 2022 19:41
Judging from the new CPU core and GPU it uses, 7 Gen 1 should perform better than the 778G.
+65 Reply