Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 720G

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and Snapdragon 720G (Adreno 618). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Supports 72% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Performs 47% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 51%) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 517K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  • Higher GPU frequency (~36%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
783606
CPU 326426 218272
GPU 101452 50078
Memory 119484 103903
UX 236244 145207
Total score 783606 517460
Samples [113 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 94.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 45.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 62.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 33.9 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 55.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 5.39 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 15.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 2.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 21 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 0.78 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 3.86 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 217.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 314
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 4 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 8030
Video editing score 6994 6295
Data manipulation score 9642 7577
Photo editing score 24463 18039
Writing score 14285 9464
Phones tested 11 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]
43 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]
40 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]
34 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
30 FPS
[High]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
Realme 7 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Jaegerr)AnTuTu791396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (bebequinhamota)AnTuTu744550
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-24 (kat)AnTuTu747598
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (CarlosSM)AnTuTu839993
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 -> SynXAnTuTu820292
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Aether2005)AnTuTu563764
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Joe_cool)AnTuTu504036
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-27 (Makasin0)AnTuTu624334
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (DarkELITECustom.PH)GeekBench CPU751 / 1835
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (DarkELITECustom.PH)AnTuTu524287

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 720G

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Adreno 618
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 550 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 256
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 384 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 692
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- 384 kHz/32 bit

Connectivity

Modem X53 X15
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 15
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 January 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 SM7125
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2128 (87.7%)
299 (12.3%)
Total votes: 2427

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 720G and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Prodigit September 23, 2023 at 10:10 PM
The Galaxy A72 is a pretty good phone for what it is. It does casual gaming, and has great battery life. But the A73 has a newer processor that will be better for gamers. 3x the shader units are nearly desktop budget graphics card performance (similar to between a GT1030 and a GTX 1050). The only game that I use that would benefit from the higher shader count would be war robots, mainly in reflections. Though the performance would be very similar to my nearly 7 year old $600 LeEco phone with Snapdragon 820.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Kevin March 26, 2023 at 12:50 AM
A52 vs A52s For gaming : A52s For daily use A52 (don't waste your money if you don't play games like COD or Pubg or .... )
+35 Reply
Avatar
Spiral November 1, 2021 at 07:53 AM
42 fps vs 40 on Call of Duty Mobile? Lol this must be a joke. Even exynos 9825 in f62 gives almost 60 fps. This processor sd 778g ain't much better. Just a slight tweak in performance and all the hype for ntg.
+90 Reply
Avatar
Ridwan November 28, 2021 at 06:36 PM
I am getting 60fps in cod with my realme gt master edition which has an SD 778G Soc. in a very high setting.
+93 Reply