Snapdragon 855 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640) with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 56% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2490 MHz)
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~92%)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 895K vs 824K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
895627
CPU 314517 309104
GPU 125449 144993
Memory 150134 139578
UX 234413 301952
Total score 824513 895627
Samples [39 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A12 Bionic +36%
1318
Multi-Core Score
A12 Bionic +15%
3134
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A12 Bionic +191%
7868
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 608.2 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 19 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A12 Bionic +69%
1482
Score 876 1482
Stability 86% 65%
Graphics test 5 FPS 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8813 -
Video editing score 5956 -
Data manipulation score 8239 -
Photo editing score 22485 -
Writing score 13084 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 GPU3882
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 CPU1000 / 3025
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)AnTuTu 11884066
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU1344 / 4757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Π”ΠΈΠΌΠ°)AnTuTu 11644981
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 GPU7868
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 CPU1306 / 2770
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu 11756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 585 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAC‑LC
- AAX ΠΈ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HE‑AAC
- HE‑AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2018 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8150 APL1W81
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1536 (47.7%)
1686 (52.3%)
Total votes: 3222

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ronaldo SUUIII November 24, 2022 at 11:18 PM
Why does the iphone 8 plus perform better than the iphone X and iphone 8?
+142 Reply
Avatar
llnk July 30, 2024 at 05:18 PM
just, my opinion The iPhone 8 use smaller screen and resolution but has the lower battery, which can make apple reduce the performance of the Chip to hold the battery (also ip8 has lower RAM too) The iPhone X use the OLED screen, which drain the battery more than IPS LCD, also the resolution of ipX is a little bit higher than ip8+
+1 Reply
Avatar
Ur November 15, 2021 at 03:22 PM
Keep in mind the SD 855 is much cheaper
+48 Reply
Avatar
plu October 20, 2023 at 07:06 AM
No, the 855 was only available on flagship models like the Samsung S10, which costs $900. That's almost equivalent to the price of the iPhone X.
+27 Reply
Avatar
Scoff August 26, 2025 at 02:57 AM
plu, No, the 855 was also available on cheaper mid range phones like the Redmi K20 Pro, which is also called Mi 9T. Absolute beast of a phone
+5 Reply