Snapdragon 855 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640) with the newer 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 37% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.2x)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 61%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1326K vs 824K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2840 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A14 Bionic +61%
1326975
CPU 314517 364692
GPU 125449 311592
Memory 150134 180518
UX 234413 470169
Total score 824513 1326975
Samples [39 tests] [55 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A14 Bionic +116%
2095
Multi-Core Score
A14 Bionic +94%
5297
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A14 Bionic +522%
16822
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 19 tests 17 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2767
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Section 1 - 13 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A14 Bionic +154%
2229
Score 876 2229
Stability 86% 86%
Graphics test 5 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8813 -
Video editing score 5956 -
Data manipulation score 8239 -
Photo editing score 22485 -
Writing score 13084 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Zakazaka1273)AnTuTu 11855696
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Barelpunch)AnTuTu 111200682
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Z0tacxyz)AnTuTu 111294739
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Timur)AnTuTu 111199214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (kudryash)AnTuTu 111196958
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Stelle)AnTuTu 111288870

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2840 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 585 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP -
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G -
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2018 September 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8150 APL1W01
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
167 (31.4%)
365 (68.6%)
Total votes: 532

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!