Snapdragon 865 vs Google Tensor

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (with Adreno 650 graphics) and Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~45%)
  • Performs 20% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1010025
CPU 385127 365546
GPU 148169 169803
Memory 166070 178763
UX 279544 295913
Total score 978910 1010025
Samples [104 tests] [51 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1477
Multi-Core Score
3595
Asset compression 149.1 MB/sec 159.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 87.2 pages/sec 97.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 125.3 Mpixels/sec 138.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 77 images/sec 83.4 images/sec
HDR 106.3 Mpixels/sec 119.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11 images/sec 14.1 images/sec
Photo processing 32.7 images/sec 30.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.29 Mpixels/sec 3.44 Mpixels/sec
Samples 52 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8918
Background blur 4.53 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Face detection 1.97 images/sec 7.31 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.5 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.05 Gpixels/sec 39.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 567.3 FPS 1368.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 34 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 704
Stability - 63%
Graphics test - 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1899
Score 1110 1899
Stability 99% 59%
Graphics test 6 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11621
Web score 9557 7105
Video editing score 5874 5884
Data manipulation score 8658 10310
Photo editing score 29642 19072
Writing score 14782 15550
Phones tested 14 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 61 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 30 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (GameFabuloso16)AnTuTu1010010
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> RennsportAnTuTu1066668
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (May)AnTuTu745543
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234GeekBench GPU3056
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234GeekBench CPU1129 / 3155
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu774697
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu930801
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (nguyen van nguyen)AnTuTu990021
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 (Mimo)AnTuTu1117985
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Hypermini)AnTuTu1015541

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and Google Tensor

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5.6 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 650 Mali-G78 MP20
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 587 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 3 20
Shading units 256 32
Total shaders 768 640
FLOPS 901.6 Gigaflops 1085.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X55 Exynos 5300b
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2019 October 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8250-AB GS101 (S5P9845)
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site Google Tensor official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
327 (27.6%)
857 (72.4%)
Total votes: 1184

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Google Tensor and Snapdragon 865, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Guna(iqoo 3 user) February 19, 2025 at 05:48 PM
865 is beast. Tensor feels like sd 765g in gaming .
+15 Reply
Avatar
Rob's September 25, 2023 at 08:12 PM
I got the pixel 6a and is faster than my s 20 ultra and oddly enough I prefer the photos from my 6a 🧐
+29 Reply
Avatar
Zeal Zenith June 5, 2023 at 06:11 AM
I have a pixel 6 Pro and S20 Fe and both are amazing not having any issues with both phone.
+14 Reply
Avatar
Lexitius October 21, 2022 at 12:37 AM
I cast my vote for the Snapdragon 865 because if you do a real-world test, it outperformed the Tensor when running Apps and video games in general.
+79 Reply
Avatar
Lowkeythegod_ October 5, 2024 at 10:39 PM
Nah bruh, this is cap
0 Reply
Avatar
vie November 8, 2024 at 06:54 AM
Lowkeythegod_, actually as a 865 user its true that its perform better in gaming for example pubgm on 865 can reach extreme+ while on tensor would reach extreme only for highest fps
+3 Reply
Avatar
Tom petitt February 6, 2022 at 03:22 PM
I don't think these numbers match up. I have a one plus 8t and it's super fast. I don't think a Google phone with an unproven chip could win in real-world comparison. Is tensor chip that good? It's made by Exynos. And everything is customized to work with snapdragon. Games, apps, everything!
+44 Reply
Avatar
Robin April 30, 2022 at 03:42 PM
I had a OnePlus 8t and now a pixel 6. The only benefits from pixel 6 are better photos and wireless charging. 8t is just better from all other aspects, especially being cooler and lighter. Pixel's Android 12 is still very buggy in April 2022.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Sam July 12, 2022 at 12:16 AM
Robin, Which one is the best in games, likes pubg???
+64 Reply
Avatar
Subuser July 17, 2022 at 06:42 PM
Sam, The Tensor is better but as for the phone, the Pixel 6 has many bugs that are still being reported even to this day.
+6 Reply
Avatar
kel December 15, 2022 at 07:28 PM
Sam, Snapdragon 865... All day long. The Tensor is just not optimized for gaming.
+22 Reply