Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs A16 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (Adreno 825) with the older 6-core Apple A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 42%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2314K vs 1626K
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 32% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~22%)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 3210 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2314417
1626008
CPU 645495 432740
GPU 809405 490354
Memory 372805 216774
UX 486712 486140
Total score 2314417 1626008
Samples [457 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 293.4 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 188.6 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 207.8 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 152.7 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 216.4 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.4 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 55.2 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.25 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A16 Bionic +24%
22851
Background blur 33.5 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 16.8 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.62 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.77 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.2 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 70.4 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2750.3 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 35 tests 12 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1688 -
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7641 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test 29 FPS 16 FPS
Section 1 34 FPS 20 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 16 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3705 3335
Stability - 71%
Graphics test 22 FPS 19 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15597 -
Video editing score 7750 -
Data manipulation score 13734 -
Photo editing score 26988 -
Writing score 17764 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Jk)AnTuTu 122384830
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Илья)AnTuTu 122410797
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (JIRO)AnTuTu 122506883
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (H20_lazz)AnTuTu 122565440
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Илья)AnTuTu 122410797
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Gurudev)AnTuTu 111226584
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Атомная Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°)AnTuTu 111772840
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3210 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 825 Apple A16 GPU
Architecture Adreno 800 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1150 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 2 5
Shading units 512 128
Total shaders 1024 640
FLOPS 2355.2 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced April 2025 September 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8735 APL1W10
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
205 (75.6%)
66 (24.4%)
Total votes: 271

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Rahman September 30, 2026 at 04:09 AM
Apple Bionic is full of glitch and snapdragon is full of aura
0 Reply