Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 920

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 920 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 920
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 750K vs 615K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
615425
750481
CPU 256114 290440
GPU 71758 78028
Memory 95251 150165
UX 192302 231848
Total score 615425 750481
Samples [56 tests] [10 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2318
Asset compression 102.4 MB/sec 117.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52.1 pages/sec 61.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.3 Mpixels/sec 78.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37 images/sec 43.5 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 72.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.2 images/sec 6.73 images/sec
Photo processing 16.9 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec 3.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples 37 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
2321
Background blur 3.25 images/sec 2.95 images/sec
Face detection 1.62 images/sec 1.44 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7 Gpixels/sec 6.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 408.3 FPS 385.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 18 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 226 232
Stability 95% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 628 633
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
13347
Web score 9628 10805
Video editing score 7350 6810
Data manipulation score 8838 8454
Photo editing score 22696 34185
Writing score 13552 16317
Phones tested 3 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 64 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 59 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 68 FPS
[Medium]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 46 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Realme 9 Pro Plus
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1280
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-19 -> Black_KRGMAnTuTu 12783535
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 -> Black_KRGMAnTuTu 12765124
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (James)AnTuTu 11612157
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Smile)AnTuTu 12697936
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (eimakill)AnTuTu 12709508
MediaTek Dimensity 920
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Hard)AnTuTu 11767408
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)Geekbench 6 GPU2269
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2318
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)AnTuTu 11745837
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-05 (Anerierisa)AnTuTu 11750481

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Dimensity 920

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 897 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 229.6 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.3 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 August 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8825 MT6877T
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
350 (24.8%)
1063 (75.2%)
Total votes: 1413

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 920 and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Albert November 5, 2023 at 10:53 PM
How can Exynos possibly have a better battery life when, according to the architecture list, Exynos uses 6W and Dimensity only uses 4W? How can Exynos be more efficient in comparison?
+23 Reply