Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 – what's better?

Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Exynos 1330
VS
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Exynos 1330
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali-G68 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (Adreno 613). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 607K vs 568K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 1330
vs
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 1330 +7%
607489
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
568395
CPU 274218 201238
GPU 42656 46388
Memory 107262 157900
UX 183353 162869
Total score 607489 568395
Samples [25 tests] [17 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 113 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 56 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 65.3 Mpixels/sec 83.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41 images/sec 44.7 images/sec
HDR 57.2 Mpixels/sec 72.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 6.33 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 22.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.43 Mpixels/sec 3.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 10 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.94 images/sec 0.62 images/sec
Face detection 0.95 images/sec 0.32 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.73 Gpixels/sec 1.34 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 221.7 FPS 25.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 5 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 139 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 364 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10836 9242
Video editing score 6753 4380
Data manipulation score 9036 7347
Photo editing score 20957 19716
Writing score 16436 13346
Phones tested 3 models 8 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1330
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (IhaveName)AnTuTu 12341823
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ACIMASIZ)AnTuTu 12706733
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Đỗ Đông Điền)AnTuTu 11632633
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Tom Pearl)AnTuTu 12754245
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Điền)AnTuTu 11516874
Add View all (34)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Sharwin)AnTuTu 12561406
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Googoo gaga)AnTuTu 11598730
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-21 -> LCSOnanoreviewGeekbench 6 CPU902 / 2038
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> LCSOnanoreviewAnTuTu 11618186
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-15 (Arun gurjar)AnTuTu 11531608
Add View all (20)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP2 Adreno 613
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 949 MHz 955 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 64 128
FLOPS 121.5 Gigaflops 244.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1200
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X61
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 900 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 June 2023
Class Low end Mid range
Model number S5E8535 SM4450
Official page Samsung Exynos 1330 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
293 (65.3%)
156 (34.7%)
Total votes: 449

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (5)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (4)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (3)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (19)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (4)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (23)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (14)
8. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (6)
9. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (3)
10. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Samsung Exynos 1280 (6)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and Exynos 1330, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Big June 2, 2024 at 07:41 AM
Congratulations to Samsung for winning this round
+2 Reply
Avatar
Kauçuk September 23, 2024 at 09:11 AM
It's actually like Samsung vs Samsung here as both are manufactured by Samsung lol (Samsung manufacturing is known to be inefficent) The GPU score here is actually ridiculous as the budget chips that get 250K from 2020's has roughly the same GPU scores. I am not expecting a budget SoC to have midrange gaming performance but any GPU score thats below 60K is inexcusable. 1330 here also has poor GPU score but its understandable on a budget chip.
+3 Reply
Avatar
H_oe August 2, 2023 at 02:43 PM
It's sad to see how processor manufacturers don't optimize powerful SoCs like 4 gen 2 to be able to record 4k.
+33 Reply
Avatar
You January 30, 2024 at 11:54 AM
The CPU is powerful indeed, but the GPU is subpar. It's merely a renamed Adreno 610 from the SD680 and SD665 models.
+14 Reply
EnglishРусский