Exynos 1380 vs Kirin 980

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 980 (Mali-G76 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~32%)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 767K vs 736K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 980
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
767711
736755
CPU 320484 322481
GPU 91141 107109
Memory 113558 146249
UX 242528 160916
Total score 767711 736755
Samples [113 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1008
928
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 980 +6%
2875
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 128.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 75 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 97.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 59.9 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 85.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 10.1 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 22.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 3.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 980 +20%
3657
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 5.49 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 3.47 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 12.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 485.7 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 35 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 279 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
808
675
Score 808 675
Stability 99% 48%
Graphics test 4 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12792
8701
Web score 10597 7820
Video editing score 7345 5774
Data manipulation score 10909 7472
Photo editing score 25069 14221
Writing score 16185 10928
Phones tested 8 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 39 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-27 (RockyyTech)AnTuTu 12921330
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> dimitar_05AnTuTu 12879492
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 (M54 killer)AnTuTu 12861137
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 (Roman7)AnTuTu 12889574
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 (Vic1)AnTuTu 12885698
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-25 -> MinehuevaAnTuTu 12876124
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 (k4m1k4z3)AnTuTu 12889765
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (k4m1k4z3)AnTuTu 12819294
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Absolute_subzero)AnTuTu 12903849
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Adiit)AnTuTu 12919298

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Kirin 980

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 4 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G76 MP10
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 720 MHz
Pipelines 5 10
Shading units 32 24
Total shaders 160 240
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 345.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3120 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced February 2023 August 2018
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8835 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1680 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
73 (60.3%)
48 (39.7%)
Total votes: 121

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 980 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!