Exynos 1380 vs Dimensity 8200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8200
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 62%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1240K vs 767K
  • 29% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
767711
1240821
CPU 320484 428145
GPU 91141 233006
Memory 113558 267125
UX 242528 312545
Total score 767711 1240821
Samples [113 tests] [73 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1239
Multi-Core Score
3962
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 172.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 108 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 140.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 86.2 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 118.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 34.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 4.63 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 28 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4268
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 955.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 35 tests 15 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
626
Score 279 626
Stability 98% 97%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1788
Score 808 1788
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 4 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12792
13348
Web score 10597 11474
Video editing score 7345 5571
Data manipulation score 10909 10859
Photo editing score 25069 32165
Writing score 16185 20448
Phones tested 8 models 11 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (kotakbass.official)AnTuTu829716
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu775543
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 -> akash12ytAnTuTu714654
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 -> Jm2retAnTuTu781013
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 -> Jm2retAnTuTu781013
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Kubyshko)AnTuTu1130854
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_GeekBench GPU4860
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 -> qngz_GeekBench CPU1354 / 4129
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Dragon73828)AnTuTu1329392
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 -> Regenis0CPU Throttle78%

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Dimensity 8200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 5 6
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 160 384
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 729.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 580
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 December 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8835 MT6896Z
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - MediaTek Dimensity 8400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
29 (13.6%)
184 (86.4%)
Total votes: 213

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8200 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
just new December 15, 2023 at 06:17 AM
Who are the four people who chose the Exynos 1380?
+42 Reply