Exynos 1580 vs A16 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 1580 (Samsung Xclipse 540) with the older 6-core Apple A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1580
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 34% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1626K vs 1251K
  • 19% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1251512
A16 Bionic +30%
1626008
CPU 490457 432740
GPU 296896 490354
Memory 173263 216774
UX 290896 486140
Total score 1251512 1626008
Samples [139 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A16 Bionic +94%
2631
Multi-Core Score
A16 Bionic +70%
6602
Asset compression 187.2 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 98.5 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 73.4 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.9 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.13 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A16 Bionic +232%
22851
Background blur 13.8 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 6.57 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.7 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 727.6 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 19 tests 12 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 655 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 16 FPS
Section 1 - 20 FPS
Section 2 - 16 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3335
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 19 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12398 -
Video editing score 7114 -
Data manipulation score 10983 -
Photo editing score 23206 -
Writing score 16063 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> Baogia_VNAnTuTu 111281445
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 121090096
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 111278747
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 121090096
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Tannery)AnTuTu 111335615
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Iphone)AnTuTu 111585568
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Gurudev)AnTuTu 111226584
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Атомная Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°)AnTuTu 111772840

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1580 and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2900 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 16 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 540 Apple A16 GPU
Architecture RDNA 3 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 2 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 640
FLOPS 1331.2 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 14.7 TOPS 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2024 September 2022
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8855 APL1W10
Official page Samsung Exynos 1580 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
31 (19.7%)
126 (80.3%)
Total votes: 157

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Exynos 1580, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
nya April 2, 2025 at 09:57 PM
man, it's broken, ipad 11th gen(2025) and samsung tab fe(2025) gonna be at similar price range, samsung lover now will process 2X slower then avg apple fan
+60 Reply