Exynos 1580 vs Dimensity 9300 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1580 (with Samsung Xclipse 540 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus (Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
  • Performs 3x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 200% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 1580
  • Shows significantly better (up to 88%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2348K vs 1251K
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (3400 vs 2900 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1251512
2348248
CPU 490457 703826
GPU 296896 790915
Memory 173263 326393
UX 290896 527114
Total score 1251512 2348248
Samples [139 tests] [94 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 187.2 MB/sec 300.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 98.5 pages/sec 204.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 254.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 73.4 images/sec 161.7 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 239.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.9 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 69 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.13 Mpixels/sec 7.77 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 38 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
15274
Background blur 13.8 images/sec 26.8 images/sec
Face detection 6.57 images/sec 12 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.69 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.81 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.7 Gpixels/sec 30.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 727.6 FPS 3146.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 26 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 655 1831
Stability 98% 91%
Graphics test 5 FPS 14 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 7559
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 32 FPS
Section 2 - 29 FPS
Section 3 - 24 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 5071
Graphics test - 30 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12979
14255
Web score 12398 12141
Video editing score 7114 5576
Data manipulation score 10983 12937
Photo editing score 23206 29738
Writing score 16063 22352
Phones tested 3 models 11 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 GPU5755
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 CPU1191 / 3814
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (.)AnTuTu 121017323
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> CR7AnTuTu 121030440
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat)AnTuTu 122403705
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410AnTuTu 122626976
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ThΓ nh)AnTuTu 122400294
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (NK808)AnTuTu 122667628
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (TuαΊ₯n Nguyα»…πŸ‡»πŸ‡³)AnTuTu 122637244

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1580 and Dimensity 9300 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 512 KB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 22.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7.3 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 540 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
Architecture RDNA 3 5th gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 2 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 1536
FLOPS 1331.2 Gigaflops 3993.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 790
NPU theoretical performance 14.7 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5T
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T830
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 May 2024
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8855 MT6989, MT6989W/TCZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 1580 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
16 (17.6%)
75 (82.4%)
Total votes: 91

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9300 Plus and Exynos 1580, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
QuackityDuck January 16, 2025 at 05:54 PM
Who are the 2 people who chose Exynos, it's obvious Dimensity is better lil bro.
+10 Reply
Avatar
sigmafxyt June 12, 2025 at 02:36 PM
lol they are just fanboys or probably using that chipset atm
0 Reply