Exynos 1580 vs Snapdragon 888

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1580 (with Samsung Xclipse 540 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (Adreno 660). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1580
  • Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1251K vs 1135K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1251512
1135878
CPU 490457 406119
GPU 296896 233383
Memory 173263 188085
UX 290896 308291
Total score 1251512 1135878
Samples [139 tests] [127 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1500
Multi-Core Score
3888
Asset compression 187.2 MB/sec 156.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 98.5 pages/sec 86.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 104.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 73.4 images/sec 72.9 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 104.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.9 images/sec 12.1 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.13 Mpixels/sec 4.04 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
6878
Background blur 13.8 images/sec 7.75 images/sec
Face detection 6.57 images/sec 3.37 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.7 Gpixels/sec 13.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 727.6 FPS 851.2 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 655 505
Stability 98% 77%
Graphics test 5 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1508
Stability - 91%
Graphics test - 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12979
13229
Web score 12398 12232
Video editing score 7114 7638
Data manipulation score 10983 10494
Photo editing score 23206 29866
Writing score 16063 15219
Phones tested 3 models 11 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 112 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Neagu Mihai)GeekBench CPU1348 / 3823
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Neagu Mihai)AnTuTu1287132
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (Ferran)AnTuTu1269203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Datssemble)GeekBench CPU1349 / 3757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Claus)AnTuTu1264715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekBench CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu1210861
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)GeekBench CPU1537 / 3989
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)AnTuTu1253342
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 -> AlicanTuTuAnTuTu1198886

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1580 and Snapdragon 888

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 540 Adreno 660
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 256 768
FLOPS 1331.2 Gigaflops 1290.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.1
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 780
NPU theoretical performance 14.7 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X60
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 December 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8855 SM8350
Official page Samsung Exynos 1580 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
625 (65.9%)
324 (34.1%)
Total votes: 949

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 1580, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
David January 10, 2025 at 01:03 PM
Hate 888. I hope this will be as fast and cool as 7+ gen 2
+18 Reply
Avatar
Richard March 3, 2025 at 02:03 PM
7+ gen 2 is million times better than both Also 7+ gen 2 Poco F5 on Custom ROMs has similar performance as 8 elite in most games 7+ gen 2 easily beats 8 gen 2 8 gen 3 8s gen 3 in terms of sustained performance thermals or efficiency
+12 Reply
Avatar
Yous March 10, 2025 at 07:27 PM
Richard, Stop the cap 7 + gen 2 is literally 8+ plus gen 1 with lower clock speed he's not millions of times he's just the devolp from them
+30 Reply
Avatar
Richard March 23, 2025 at 10:07 AM
Yous, Sorry bro I tried 7+ gen 2 in superior Os ROM and it gives same performance as 8 Elite in Iqoo 13 in Genshin and Pubg Mobile In benchmarks 7+ gen 2 stayed at 34Β°c 8 Elite even crossed 43Β°c in antutu or 3d benchmarks 7+ gen 2 is far better than 8 gen 3 8 gen 2 What's 8+ gen 1? No performance advantages in these newer chips Phone manufacturers always lock the performance
+1 Reply
Avatar
Christofer (Samsung Galaxy M54 5G) August 2, 2025 at 07:43 PM
Richard, And my 8+ gen 1 stay in 31Β°, i mean, 34Β° is still hot
+4 Reply
Avatar
Christofer August 2, 2025 at 07:44 PM
Richard, My 8+ Gen 1 run benchmark stayed at 31Β° I mean, 34Β° is still hot
+2 Reply
Avatar
CrimsonThund November 20, 2025 at 06:50 PM
Richard, 7+ gen 2 yes it is better than snapdragon 888 and exynos 1580, butt what the hell the other comparisions its just a joke hahahaha
0 Reply
Avatar
Sankor April 22, 2026 at 01:31 PM
CrimsonThund, The 1580 has a stronger gpu
0 Reply
Avatar
KauΓ§uk December 7, 2024 at 07:34 PM
Let's see if speculations of 1580 being a 888 substitude are right or not. I am betting tremendously better thermals yet gaming might be head to head or 1580 would take the L by a slim margin.
+65 Reply