Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (Adreno 730). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1294K vs 1065K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1065369
1294871
CPU 373598 490530
GPU 156133 202615
Memory 227441 221583
UX 308197 380143
Total score 1065369 1294871
Samples [40 tests] [90 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 162 MB/sec 151.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 104 pages/sec 104.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 135.5 Mpixels/sec 124.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 69.2 images/sec 88.5 images/sec
HDR 113 Mpixels/sec 119.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.9 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 35.2 images/sec 38.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.67 Mpixels/sec 4.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 54 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 9.88 images/sec 9.81 images/sec
Face detection 5.1 images/sec 4.42 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 21.5 Gpixels/sec 15.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1290.7 FPS 1079.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 17 tests 30 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 328 729
Stability 72% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1800 2255
Stability 64% 63%
Graphics test 10 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13238 13237
Video editing score 7092 7311
Data manipulation score 10433 10976
Photo editing score 29658 27827
Writing score 15614 15631
Phones tested Less than 3 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 114 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 40 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Nurik)AnTuTu 12900228
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luckyy)AnTuTu 121281558
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder)AnTuTu 111014567
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (W1zex)AnTuTu 121416723
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Boeing)Geekbench 6 CPU1712 / 4287
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> NoobMiokAnTuTu 121537645
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Ray white)Geekbench 7 CPU914 / 3141
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (mirtasd)AnTuTu 11941860

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 6 MB
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 5.3 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Adreno 730
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 700
GPU frequency 854 MHz 818 MHz
Pipelines 14 2
Shading units 32 512
Total shaders 448 1024
FLOPS 765.2 Gigaflops 1675.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 26 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 Snapdragon X65
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2020 December 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 SM8450
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
382 (26%)
1087 (74%)
Total votes: 1469

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!