Exynos 2200 vs Exynos 2100
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Higher GPU frequency (~53%)
- Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
- Performs 31% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 35%) AnTuTu 11 score β 1434K vs 1065K
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 472427 | 373598 |
| GPU | 390230 | 156133 |
| Memory | 216173 | 227441 |
| UX | 355339 | 308197 |
| Total score | 1434169 | 1065369 |
| Samples | [52 tests] | [40 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 169.2 MB/sec | 162 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 103 pages/sec | 104 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 133.7 Mpixels/sec | 135.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 101.3 images/sec | 69.2 images/sec |
| HDR | 130.8 Mpixels/sec | 113 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 14.7 images/sec | 11.9 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 34.9 images/sec | 35.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.65 Mpixels/sec | 4.67 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 25 tests | 25 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 14.6 images/sec | 9.88 images/sec |
| Face detection | 9.75 images/sec | 5.1 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.41 Gpixels/sec | 0.29 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.36 Gpixels/sec | 0.35 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.48 Gpixels/sec | 0.37 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.09 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 38.1 Gpixels/sec | 21.5 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 1860.5 FPS | 1290.7 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | OpenCL |
| Samples | 14 tests | 17 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 900 | 328 |
| Stability | 66% | 72% |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 3972 | - |
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 18 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 12 FPS | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 1918 | 1800 |
| Stability | 64% | 64% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11932 | 13238 |
| Video editing score | 7385 | 7092 |
| Data manipulation score | 12323 | 10433 |
| Photo editing score | 24230 | 29658 |
| Writing score | 16664 | 15614 |
| Phones tested | 4 models | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 2200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | Geekbench 6 GPU | 10630 |
| π 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik)) | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-09 (Hangal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1587642 |
| π 2026-09-09 (Basiks) | AnTuTu 11 | 1227101 |
Samsung Exynos 2100
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder) | AnTuTu 11 | 1014567 |
| π 2026-07-22 (Squizzyyy) | AnTuTu 11 | 857016 |
| π 2026-07-10 (TechNova0627) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1446 / 3772 |
| π 2026-07-10 (TechNova0627) | AnTuTu 11 | 1115971 |
| π 2026-07-05 (Luckyy) | AnTuTu 11 | 1086158 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Exynos 2100CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz β Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz β Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz β Cortex-A510 |
1x 2.91 GHz β Cortex-X1 3x 2.81 GHz β Cortex-A78 4x 2.2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 7 W | 8 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G78 MP14 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 1306 MHz | 854 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3 | 14 |
| Shading units | 128 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 384 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 1003 Gigaflops | 765.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| NPU theoretical performance | - | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s | 51.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 8K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 Mbps | Up to 7350 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | December 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9925 | S5E9840 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site | Samsung Exynos 2100 official site |
| Successor | - Samsung Exynos 2500 | - Samsung Exynos 2500 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1797