Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 835

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (Adreno 540). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.4x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1065K vs 438K
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 10 nm)
  • Supports 72% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 29.8 GB/s)
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2450 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~20%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2100 +143%
1065369
CPU 373598 148324
GPU 156133 101521
Memory 227441 88938
UX 308197 99233
Total score 1065369 438016
Samples [40 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2100 +236%
1435
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2100 +137%
3555
Asset compression 162 MB/sec 87.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 104 pages/sec 46.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 135.5 Mpixels/sec 56.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 69.2 images/sec 15.6 images/sec
HDR 113 Mpixels/sec 48.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.9 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Photo processing 35.2 images/sec 11 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.67 Mpixels/sec 2.23 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2100 +372%
6754
Background blur 9.88 images/sec 3.08 images/sec
Face detection 5.1 images/sec 1.3 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 21.5 Gpixels/sec 5.03 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1290.7 FPS 105.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 17 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 328 -
Stability 72% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 2100 +389%
1800
Score 1800 368
Stability 64% 97%
Graphics test 10 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13533
Web score 13238 5581
Video editing score 7092 5841
Data manipulation score 10433 5696
Photo editing score 29658 13302
Writing score 15614 7633
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder)AnTuTu1014567
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-22 (Squizzyyy)AnTuTu857016
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-10 (TechNova0627)GeekBench CPU1446 / 3772
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-10 (TechNova0627)AnTuTu1115971
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Luckyy)AnTuTu1086158
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-13 (Lee)GeekBench CPU382 / 1166
πŸ“˜ 2023-09-25 (Nightshot)GeekBench CPU427 / 1500

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 835

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.45 GHz – Kryo 280 (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 280 (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2450 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
Process 5 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Adreno 540
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 500
GPU frequency 854 MHz 710 MHz
Pipelines 14 4
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 448 256
FLOPS 765.2 Gigaflops 363.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 11

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 682
NPU theoretical performance 26 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 29.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 X16
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 16
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced December 2020 November 2016
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 MSM8998
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
38 (88.4%)
5 (11.6%)
Total votes: 43

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!