Exynos 2500 vs Exynos 2100

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the older 8-core Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Performs 5.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.1x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2289K vs 1065K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (3300 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2500 +115%
2289696
1065369
CPU 771016 373598
GPU 723824 156133
Memory 356421 227441
UX 438435 308197
Total score 2289696 1065369
Samples [8 tests] [40 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2285
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2500 +121%
7874
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 162 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 104 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 135.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 69.2 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 113 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 11.9 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 4.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2500 +179%
18873
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 9.88 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 5.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 21.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 1290.7 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2500 +580%
2231
Score 2231 328
Stability 54% 72%
Graphics test 17 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 9397 -
Graphics test 36 FPS -
Section 1 43 FPS -
Section 2 35 FPS -
Section 3 29 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1800
Stability - 64%
Graphics test - 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16035
13533
Web score 15720 13238
Video editing score 8133 7092
Data manipulation score 11954 10433
Photo editing score 32035 29658
Writing score 22532 15614
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
Samsung Exynos 2100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luckyy)AnTuTu 121281558
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder)AnTuTu 111014567
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-22 (Squizzyyy)AnTuTu 11857016

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Exynos 2100

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 3 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Mali-G78 MP14
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 999 MHz 854 MHz
Pipelines 8 14
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 1024 448
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 765.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 26 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 December 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 S5E9840
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site Samsung Exynos 2100 official site
Successor - - Samsung Exynos 2500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
10 (47.6%)
11 (52.4%)
Total votes: 21

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2100 and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!