Exynos 2400 vs Apple A18

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the newer 6-core Apple A18 (Apple A18 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
  • Performs 79% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 4 more cores
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2046K vs 1972K
Pros of Apple A18
  • Higher GPU frequency (~36%)
  • 26% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 3210 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2046435
1972476
CPU 698933 611649
GPU 637772 589953
Memory 301201 181123
UX 408529 589751
Total score 2046435 1972476
Samples [93 tests] [29 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Apple A18 +62%
3431
Multi-Core Score
Apple A18 +27%
8638
Asset compression 285.5 MB/sec 286.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 167.2 pages/sec 184.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 165.6 Mpixels/sec 201.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 168.2 images/sec 297.2 images/sec
HDR 207.3 Mpixels/sec 279.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.3 images/sec 36.2 images/sec
Photo processing 63.9 images/sec 90 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.73 Mpixels/sec 8.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 38 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
16273
Apple A18 +72%
28010
Background blur 28.2 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Face detection 15 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.6 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 1.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 1.44 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 77.8 Gpixels/sec 77.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2872.5 FPS 2811.1 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 29 tests 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
1579
Score 1769 1579
Stability 67% 75%
Graphics test 13 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
8302
6750
Score 8302 6750
Graphics test 32 FPS 26 FPS
Section 1 37 FPS 31 FPS
Section 2 31 FPS 26 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3812 -
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16695 -
Video editing score 8032 -
Data manipulation score 14884 -
Photo editing score 35055 -
Writing score 21619 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (matthew ajero)AnTuTu 122377317
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Rakson)AnTuTu 122303953
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Halil)AnTuTu 122426875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Omar_syriangamerr)AnTuTu 122245977
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 122321618
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400 and Apple A18

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 10 6
Frequency 3210 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache - 8 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Apple A18 GPU
Architecture RDNA 3 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines 6 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 640
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1907 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2024 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9945 APL1V08
Official page Samsung Exynos 2400 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Apple A19

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
103 (66%)
53 (34%)
Total votes: 156

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Apple A18 and Exynos 2400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!