Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 870

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (Adreno 650) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
  • Performs 3.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 870
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2046K vs 1010K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~63%)
  • Supports 55% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2400 +103%
2046435
1010069
CPU 698933 378231
GPU 637772 155526
Memory 301201 174975
UX 408529 301337
Total score 2046435 1010069
Samples [93 tests] [102 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2115
Multi-Core Score
6826
Asset compression 285.5 MB/sec 160.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 167.2 pages/sec 86.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 165.6 Mpixels/sec 116.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 168.2 images/sec 80 images/sec
HDR 207.3 Mpixels/sec 108 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.3 images/sec 12 images/sec
Photo processing 63.9 images/sec 33.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.73 Mpixels/sec 4.41 Mpixels/sec
Samples 38 tests 34 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2400 +381%
16273
Background blur 28.2 images/sec 5.01 images/sec
Face detection 15 images/sec 2.04 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.6 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 77.8 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2872.5 FPS 650.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 29 tests 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1769 -
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 8302 -
Graphics test 32 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 31 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 2400 +211%
3812
Score 3812 1224
Stability 57% 99%
Graphics test 22 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
17172
Web score 16695 11701
Video editing score 8032 5825
Data manipulation score 14884 9987
Photo editing score 35055 28690
Writing score 21619 15274
Phones tested 3 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 102 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 107 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 49 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Black Shark 4
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 -> 2929022.OAnTuTu 122392233
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 -> m1nn44aAnTuTu 122273383
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Aadith S Dev)AnTuTu 122258170
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (User s25 fe)AnTuTu 122175598
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Vic)AnTuTu 122495318
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Skibidi lutfi)AnTuTu 121297957
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Peanut)AnTuTu 121132636
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (ex4ample)AnTuTu 121079226
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RanVerchst.)AnTuTu 121213647
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Shiro1577)AnTuTu 121179210

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 870

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.2 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3210 MHz 3200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Adreno 650
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 670 MHz
Pipelines 6 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1029.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 698

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 X55
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2024 January 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9945 SM8250-AC
Official page Samsung Exynos 2400 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
45 (61.6%)
28 (38.4%)
Total votes: 73

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 870 and Exynos 2400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!