Exynos 2500 vs Exynos 2400e

We compared two 10-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2500 (with Samsung Xclipse 950 graphics) and Exynos 2400e (Samsung Xclipse 940). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 2400e
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Performs 20% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 16%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2289K vs 1977K
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (3300 vs 3110 MHz)
  • Supports 13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 68.2 GB/s)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400e
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
1977269
CPU 771016 675682
GPU 723824 670589
Memory 356421 229976
UX 438435 401022
Total score 2289696 1977269
Samples [8 tests] [56 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2285
Multi-Core Score
7874
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 270.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 202.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 196.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 150.7 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 200.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 23.6 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 59.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 7.7 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
18873
16611
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 27.9 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 16.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.69 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 0.74 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 2483.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 21 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2231
Score 2231 1769
Stability 54% 70%
Graphics test 17 FPS 13 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
9397
Score 9397 7699
Graphics test 36 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 28 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 24 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16035
16227
Web score 15720 15997
Video editing score 8133 8031
Data manipulation score 11954 12347
Photo editing score 32035 33878
Writing score 22532 19836
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
Samsung Exynos 2400e
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekbench 6 CPU2014 / 6373

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Exynos 2400e

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.11 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 10
Frequency 3300 MHz 3110 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 3 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Samsung Xclipse 940
Architecture RDNA 3 RDNA 3
GPU frequency 999 MHz 1095 MHz
Pipelines 8 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1024 768
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 3406.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5400
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 9640 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 2550 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
55 (66.3%)
28 (33.7%)
Total votes: 83

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2400e and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!