Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9810 (with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (Adreno 630). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 594K vs 572K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
594285
CPU 257526 218886
GPU 87627 99670
Memory 115805 111434
UX 133327 142798
Total score 594285 572788
Samples [43 tests] [23 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2130
Asset compression 123.7 MB/sec 99.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.4 pages/sec 66.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 84.8 Mpixels/sec 79.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 18.8 images/sec 16.9 images/sec
HDR 82.6 Mpixels/sec 67.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.01 images/sec 5.59 images/sec
Photo processing 23.3 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.31 Mpixels/sec 2.88 Mpixels/sec
Samples 14 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4798
Background blur 8.29 images/sec 6.06 images/sec
Face detection 4.41 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.8 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 655.7 FPS 541.1 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 460
Stability - 90%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
8977
Web score 5601 7215
Video editing score 5488 6392
Data manipulation score 5650 6714
Photo editing score 9525 18641
Writing score 6250 9480
Phones tested 3 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 55 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 48 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1080 x 2246
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 -> skaeleAnTuTu635840
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)GeekBench GPU4587
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)GeekBench CPU495 / 1924
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)AnTuTu614327
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 -> leguskAnTuTu653076
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)CPU Throttle93%
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)GeekBench GPU2613
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)GeekBench CPU570 / 2056
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)AnTuTu640111
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Bisfy)AnTuTu572788

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 845

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Gold (Cortex-A75)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 256 KB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 10 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count 5.3 billion 3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Adreno 630
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 572 MHz 710 MHz
Pipelines 18 2
Shading units 12 256
Total shaders 216 512
FLOPS 247.1 Gigaflops 727 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 685

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.7 Gb/s 29.8 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 360 X20
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced January 2018 December 2017
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9810 SDM845
Official page Samsung Exynos 9810 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1238 (56.3%)
959 (43.7%)
Total votes: 2197

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 845 and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Singe core v.s. multicore October 9, 2022 at 12:36 PM
How is the single-core score so much higher for the Exynos but less for the multi-core score? Its 4 efficiency cores have higher speeds than the Snapdragon's 4 efficiency cores (or whatever you call them, the lower clock speed cores). Also, the Exynos has a larger L3 cache, so what gives? The multi-core score should be higher than you'd think.
+41 Reply
Avatar
The NiGhTsHoT July 17, 2023 at 08:43 AM
Because Exynos 9810 uses a frequency policy similar to Intel's Turbo Boost. On single core, the M3 Cores will burst to 2704MHz as long as needed, but as soon as the load becomes multi-threaded, it drops all the way down to 1794MHz. And at 1794MHz, Exynos 9810 is pretty much equal to Snapdragon 845.
+27 Reply
Avatar
Wait what? December 15, 2020 at 03:41 PM
Why is the cpu score of the exynos only 2 points better but single core is 60% better and multi core is 15% better?
+105 Reply
root December 15, 2020 at 03:50 PM
Hi. This is because Snapdragon 845 has better AnTuTu and GPU performance.
+106 Reply
Avatar
user December 12, 2022 at 02:44 PM
Root, Snapdragon 845 has a lower AnTuTu score. Only the GPU score is higher but the overall AnTuTu score of Exynos is %3 higher. Also, the 3DMark Wild Life Performance of Exynos is %58 higher too.
+14 Reply
Avatar
The NiGhTsHoT July 17, 2023 at 08:45 AM
user, Snapdragon 845's Adreno 630 is far better in OpenGL ES workloads. Wildlife relies on Vulkan, and Qualcomm drivers for A630 are lackluster for that.
+8 Reply