Exynos 990 vs Kirin 980

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 980 (Mali-G76 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Performs 69% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~16%)
  • Shows better (up to 23%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 736K
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2730 vs 2600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +23%
907140
736755
CPU 370196 322481
GPU 130687 107109
Memory 151878 146249
UX 254379 160916
Total score 907140 736755
Samples [50 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +32%
1222
928
Multi-Core Score
3060
2875
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 128.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 75 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 97.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 59.9 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 85.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 10.1 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 22.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 3.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +44%
5261
3657
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 5.49 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 3.47 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 12.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 485.7 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 990 +110%
1416
675
Score 1416 675
Stability 65% 48%
Graphics test 8 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +31%
11402
8701
Web score 10705 7820
Video editing score 6884 5774
Data manipulation score 8823 7472
Photo editing score 30928 14221
Writing score 11422 10928
Phones tested 6 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 39 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Ctvy970)AnTuTu 11922959
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Absolute_subzero)AnTuTu 12903849
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Adiit)AnTuTu 12919298
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> DUYNGAnTuTu 12910146
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (DUYNG)AnTuTu 12901546
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Techdude98)AnTuTu 12803419

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Kirin 980

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G76 MP10
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 720 MHz
Pipelines 11 10
Shading units 32 24
Total shaders 352 240
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 345.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3120 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2019 August 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
176 (52.7%)
158 (47.3%)
Total votes: 334

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 980 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!