Exynos 990 vs Snapdragon 845

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (Adreno 630). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Shows significantly better (up to 58%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 572K
  • Supports 48% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 29.8 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  • Performs 24% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +58%
907140
CPU 370196 218886
GPU 130687 99670
Memory 151878 111434
UX 254379 142798
Total score 907140 572788
Samples [50 tests] [23 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +116%
1222
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 990 +44%
3060
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 99.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 66.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 79.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 16.9 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 67.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 5.59 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 2.88 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +104%
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 6.06 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 541.1 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 990 +208%
1416
Score 1416 460
Stability 65% 90%
Graphics test 8 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +27%
11402
Web score 10705 7215
Video editing score 6884 6392
Data manipulation score 8823 6714
Photo editing score 30928 18641
Writing score 11422 9480
Phones tested 6 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 55 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 48 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1080 x 2246
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)CPU Throttle93%
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)Geekbench 6 GPU2613
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)Geekbench 6 CPU570 / 2056
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Dzikri Khairul)AnTuTu 11640111
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Bisfy)AnTuTu 11572788

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Snapdragon 845

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Gold (Cortex-A75)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 256 KB
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Adreno 630
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 832 MHz 710 MHz
Pipelines 11 2
Shading units 32 256
Total shaders 352 512
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 727 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 685
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 29.8 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 192MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 X20
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced October 2019 December 2017
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 SDM845
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
146 (64%)
82 (36%)
Total votes: 228

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 845 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!