Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 (with Adreno 730 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus (Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
  • Performs 76% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
  • Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 28%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1822K vs 1420K
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 3200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 537485 598537
GPU 241551 477311
Memory 254727 326868
UX 387045 419380
Total score 1420808 1822096
Samples [116 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 190.8 MB/sec 213.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 126.3 pages/sec 161.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 164.1 Mpixels/sec 177.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 114.8 images/sec 126.3 images/sec
HDR 141.5 Mpixels/sec 169.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16 images/sec 17 images/sec
Photo processing 37.7 images/sec 50.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 5.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 72 tests 16 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.63 images/sec 14.3 images/sec
Face detection 5.22 images/sec 7.68 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.51 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.67 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 24.4 Gpixels/sec 22.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 666.6 FPS 2119.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 39 tests 13 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 856 1411
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 6 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 5769
Graphics test - 22 FPS
Section 1 - 25 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 19 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2756 3675
Stability 44% 68%
Graphics test 16 FPS 22 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
Web score 12737 -
Video editing score 7462 -
Data manipulation score 12439 -
Photo editing score 32017 -
Writing score 16257 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 47 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 114 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-27 (Pelman)AnTuTu 121599800
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-25 (Escafano)AnTuTu 121673321
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (Euro Fighter Typhoon)AnTuTu 121645040
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (Nothing)AnTuTu 121364146
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 (T0rt1lla)AnTuTu 121572879
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (Abhiy)AnTuTu 121860105
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (Xhydro)AnTuTu 122025019
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (SwexxπŸ‡ΉπŸ‡·)CPU Throttle94%
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Nick)AnTuTu 121859947
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Carlos SM)AnTuTu 122149732

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 and Dimensity 9200 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 17 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 730 Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
Architecture Adreno 700 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 1150 MHz
Pipelines 2 11
Shading units 512 128
Total shaders 1024 1408
FLOPS 1843.2 Gigaflops 3238.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek APU 690

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X65 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 May 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8475 MT6985
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
128 (27.6%)
336 (72.4%)
Total votes: 464

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9200 Plus and Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Alif September 11, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Adreno 700 is better than Valhalla 4
+3 Reply