Tiger T612 vs Dimensity 9400

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T612 (with Mali-G57 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Performs 126x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 8.2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 342K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 12 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.5x)
  • 101% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
342790
2825187
CPU 140139 900074
GPU 16297 972096
Memory 88702 345330
UX 97652 607687
Total score 342790 2825187
Samples [10 tests] [72 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2797
Multi-Core Score
1511
8767
Asset compression 75.2 MB/sec 344.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43 pages/sec 251 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 46.4 Mpixels/sec 258.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 24.7 images/sec 209.7 images/sec
HDR 41.2 Mpixels/sec 267.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 3.69 images/sec 30.9 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 84.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.64 Mpixels/sec 9.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples 9 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21574
Background blur 0.69 images/sec 43 images/sec
Face detection 0.33 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.78 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 1.71 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.24 Gpixels/sec 73.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 73.5 FPS 3456.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2371
Score 48 2371
Stability - 61%
Graphics test - 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 10747
Graphics test - 41 FPS
Section 1 - 46 FPS
Section 2 - 42 FPS
Section 3 - 36 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 6272
Graphics test - 37 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
7941
15020
Web score 8324 14420
Video editing score 4329 6211
Data manipulation score 5813 16192
Photo editing score 15998 30985
Writing score 9489 19569
Phones tested 6 models 6 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc Tiger T612
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Rowhsi)AnTuTu 12438508
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (AJ)AnTuTu 12454731
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (zaicorld)AnTuTu 11360251
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)Geekbench 6 CPU430 / 1390
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Shammz)AnTuTu 11364027
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T612 and Dimensity 9400

CPU

Architecture 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 1800 MHz 3620 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
L3 cache - 12 MB
Process 12 nanometers 3 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 650 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 1 12
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 32 1536
FLOPS 39.3 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) - MediaTek NPU 890
NPU theoretical performance - 50 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 7
Bluetooth 5.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2022 October 2024
Class Low end Flagship
Model number - MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA
Official page Unisoc Tiger T612 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9400 and Tiger T612, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
JameZ September 27, 2026 at 06:06 PM
Bro This Versus is a Ant Vs Sun πŸ™
0 Reply