AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with 12-cores against the 3.8 GHz Ryzen 7 7840HS with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 7840HS and 370
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  • Newer - released 1 year and 5 months later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 5.9 vs 4.1 TFLOPS
  • 16% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2985 vs 2577 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 475 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 5200 -
Cinebench Scores (102nd and 181st place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1340 MB/sec 1120 MB/sec
Clang compilation 139.9 Klines/sec 102.5 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 335.1 pages/sec 217.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 468.2 Mpixels/sec 350 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 322.1 pages/sec 251.8 pages/sec
Background blur 63.8 images/sec 59.4 images/sec
Photo processing 124.6 images/sec 87.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 33.5 Mpixels/sec 22.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 3 & 753 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 122.2 GOps/sec 97.1 GOps/sec
Floating point math 76.4 GOps/sec 59 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 127M Primes/sec 87M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 48.3M Strings/sec 40.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 22.1 GBytes/sec 20.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 442.7 MBytes/sec 340.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 1881 Frames/sec 1362 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 31.4B Matrices/sec 25.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 3074 & 4310 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
281.07

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 23 PPW 16.9 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 295.9 PPW 223.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 647.4 PPW 523.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 5.21 PPW 4.05 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Nvdya)Cinebench 2024114 / 1135
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Peterr)Cinebench 2024117 / 962
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)GeekBench2904 / 15532
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Asus Tuf FA608WI)Cinebench 2024104 / 1050
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-15 (Urxelix)Cinebench 2024116 / 1217
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-08 (Hari)Cinebench 2024104 / 880
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-31 (Safi ullah)Cinebench 2024102 / 911
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-10 (Johns)Cinebench 2024105 / 929
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-05 (KaniastyGucio)Cinebench 2024100 / 910
πŸ“˜ 2024-12-09 (Anand)Cinebench 202472 / 719

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 7 7840HS

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released June 3, 2024 January 4, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 5 (Strix Point) Zen 4 (Phoenix)
Model number 370 -
Integrated GPU Radeon 890M Radeon 780M
Rival Equivalent - Intel Core Ultra 9 285H - Intel Core i7 13620H
Successor - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (31st and 62nd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.0 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 12 8
Total Threads 24 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 38x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors - 25 billions
Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-54 W (configurable) 35-54 W (configurable)
Socket FP8 FP8
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (43rd and 93rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics AMD Radeon 890M Radeon 780M
GPU Base Clock 400 MHz 800 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2700 MHz
Shading Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 16 12
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
5.9 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5x-7500
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 official page AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 20
Further details
Notes on Ryzen 7 7840HS:
    - DDR5 memory is supported only on the FP7r2 socket, while FP7 and FP8 sockets support LPDDR5/x.
    - ECC support is available exclusively on the FP7r2 socket.

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
66 (58.9%)
46 (41.1%)
Total votes: 112

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS or AI 9 HX 370?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Joestar September 20, 2024 at 11:58 AM
I remember last year even the amd 7000 series with 780m igpu, it's already toe to toe, if not slightly ahead than intel ultra series, not to mention its newer "AI" cpu
+3 Reply
Avatar
Jozef July 10, 2024 at 09:22 AM
On CPU Side there is a small difference. However, comparing iGPU 780m and 890m and uplift of 43% brings it to much more usable area for secondary or terciary gaming device for the road or on couch. Somewhere between GTX1660ti and GTX 1070 on 15W, pretty impressive if you ask me. Indie and older games should have no issues on 1440p. Hopefully the trend continues and we see big gains in next years in this segment.
+11 Reply
Avatar
Potato September 27, 2024 at 03:30 PM
Yes, very pumped for upcoming handhelds and mini PCs coming with these chips.
+1 Reply
Avatar
some guy July 23, 2025 at 03:55 PM
Potato, now they released the 8060s igpu, absolute beast, performs above the level of the 3060, also it only consumes 80w i think
0 Reply