Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs Apple M1 GPU (8-core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) with 96 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 3 months newer Apple M1 GPU (8-core) that utilizes 128 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M1 GPU (8-core) over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Achieves 20% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (20K vs 17K)
  • Has 33% more shading units (1024 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
11
-
-
-
The Witcher 3
12
11
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
19
12
9
-
-
Far Cry 6
14
11
-
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
14
12
10
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
11
-
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
13
9
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 -
1080p Ultra 10 -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1282 -
Solar Bay - 6317
Fire Strike 4411 -
Wild Life Extreme 3119 4966
Night Raid 14097 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 34.5 img/sec 38.3 img/sec
Face Detection 27.4 img/sec 23 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.75 Gpixels/sec 0.76 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec 1.33 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.39 Gpixels/sec 0.87 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.27 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 55.6 Gpixels/sec 69.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3061.7 FPS 2766.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Sources: Blender [9] – 307 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810
Apple M1 GPU (8-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1428 1400
Image Segmentation (HP) 2420 2280
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1551 3402
Face Detection (HP) 3685 5638
Pose Estimation (Q) 6255 12027
Text Classification (SP) 938 2324
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 4296
Object Detection (SP) 1581 1530
Depth Estimation (Q) 4305 7675
Style Transfer (SP) 26119 17293
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML CPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and Apple M1 GPU (8-core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released August 15, 2020 November 20, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.1 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 -
Rival Equivalent - - GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Successor - - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above - Apple M1 or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
- Apple M1
Laptop GPU ranking (124th and 104th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 450 MHz
Boost Clock 950-1550 MHz (configurable) 1278 MHz
Shading Units 768 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 96 128
Ray-tracing Cores - No
L2 Cache 1024KB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 GPixel/s 41 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTexel/s 82 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus Custom
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing Intel Intel
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
Die Size 146 mm² -
Transistor Count - 11.6 billion
Max. Temperature - 94°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent 4266 MHz
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent 8532 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.2 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 -
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
10 (52.6%)
9 (47.4%)
Total votes: 19

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!