Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs GeForce GTX 1650

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) with 96 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year and 4 months older GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB that utilizes 14 pipelines and 896 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GTX 1650 over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 10 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
  • Performs significantly better (up to 3.9x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 3.1x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 22 vs 7 FPS
  • Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory
  • 25% higher maximum theoretical performance (3 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.3x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (39K vs 17K)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
11
-
-
57
32
24
15
The Witcher 3
12
11
-
-
43
33
21
10
Counter-Strike 2
19
12
9
-
75
54
34
14
Far Cry 6
14
11
-
-
45
41
26
13
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
25
21
17
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
14
12
10
-
37
31
20
14
Ghost of Tsushima
11
-
-
-
25
15
14
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
28
22
13
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
13
9
-
45
43
29
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 42
1080p Ultra 10 32
1440p Ultra - 22
4K Ultra - 11
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1282 3562
Solar Bay - 12275
Fire Strike 4411 9702
Wild Life Extreme 3119 7353
Night Raid 14097 46224
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 34.5 img/sec 66.4 img/sec
Face Detection 27.4 img/sec 43.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.75 Gpixels/sec 1.51 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec 1.68 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.39 Gpixels/sec 1.87 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.49 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 55.6 Gpixels/sec 187.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3061.7 FPS 5261.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 551
DirectX 11 - 58 FPS
DirectX 12 - 35 FPS
GPU Compute - 3031 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 37746 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 919 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 OpenCL16849
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810
GeForce GTX 1650
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1428 3208
Image Segmentation (HP) 2420 4254
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1551 7050
Face Detection (HP) 3685 6849
Pose Estimation (Q) 6255 23562
Text Classification (SP) 938 1755
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 3096
Object Detection (SP) 1581 3710
Depth Estimation (Q) 4305 12946
Style Transfer (SP) 26119 48894
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and GeForce GTX 1650

General

Vendor Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released August 15, 2020 April 23, 2019
Launch price (MSRP) - $149
Case Laptop Desktop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 Turing
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 TU117
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above - Intel Core i5 9400 or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
-
Laptop GPU ranking (#125th place)
Desktop GPU rating (#88th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 1485 MHz
Boost Clock 950-1550 MHz (configurable) 1665 MHz
Shading Units 768 896
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 56
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 96 14
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores - No
L1 Cache - 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 GPixel/s 53 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTexel/s 93 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
GTX 1650 +25%
3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 15 W 75 W
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 10 nm 12 nm
Die Size 146 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count - 4 billion
Transistor Density - 20 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR5
Memory Size System RAM Dependent 4 GB
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent 2001 MHz
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent 8000 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - 7.5
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
7 (30.4%)
16 (69.6%)
Total votes: 23

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!