Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs Arc 140T

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) with 96 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 4 years and 5 months newer Arc 140T that utilizes 8 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 140T over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140T
  • Performs significantly better (up to 3.6x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 2.6x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 18 vs 7 FPS
  • 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (4.8 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Achieves 2.5x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (42K vs 17K)
  • Has 33% more shading units (1024 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
11
-
-
53
28
21
12
The Witcher 3
12
11
-
-
42
33
23
12
Counter-Strike 2
19
12
9
-
48
33
22
10
Far Cry 6
14
11
-
-
37
35
24
11
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
19
14
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
14
12
10
-
31
29
21
11
Ghost of Tsushima
11
-
-
-
21
18
13
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
23
19
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
13
9
-
38
36
22
12
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 35
1080p Ultra 10 27
1440p Ultra - 18
4K Ultra - 10
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1282 3769
Solar Bay - 14421
Port Royal - 1966
Fire Strike 4411 8568
Wild Life Extreme 3119 6618
Night Raid 14097 38478
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 34.5 img/sec 90 img/sec
Face Detection 27.4 img/sec 39.5 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.75 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec 1.52 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.39 Gpixels/sec 2.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.51 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 55.6 Gpixels/sec 161.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3061.7 FPS 9155.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 835
DirectX 11 - 47 FPS
DirectX 12 - 30 FPS
GPU Compute - 2906 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5]2088 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9]41 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekBench16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekBench15810
Intel Arc 140T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-16 -> Lello75GeekBench42034
📘 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)GeekBench42182

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1428 5224
Image Segmentation (HP) 2420 10501
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1551 6436
Face Detection (HP) 3685 15277
Pose Estimation (Q) 6255 19008
Text Classification (SP) 938 1566
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 2969
Object Detection (SP) 1581 6172
Depth Estimation (Q) 4305 14526
Style Transfer (SP) 26119 62049
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and Arc 140T

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released August 15, 2020 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 Xe+
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 860M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 235H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Laptop GPU ranking (123rd and 93rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 950-1550 MHz (configurable) 2250-2350 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 96 8
Tensor Cores - 128
Ray-tracing Cores - 8
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 GPixel/s 72-75 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTexel/s 144-150 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Arc 140T +100%
4.6-4.8 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 35 W
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
Die Size 146 mm² -
Max. Temperature - 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent -
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent -
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
13 (100%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!