AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel UHD Graphics (16 EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 1 year and 5 months older Intel UHD Graphics (16 EU) that utilizes 16 pipelines and 128 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of UHD Graphics (16 EU) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 610M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • 50% higher maximum theoretical performance (0.6 vs 0.4 TFLOPS)
  • Ray-tracing support with 2 dedicated RT cores
  • Achieves 28% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (5K vs 3K)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
10
-
-
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 -
1080p Ultra - -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 308
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 1103
Wild Life Extreme 998 745
Night Raid 7335 4719
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 12 img/sec 8.99 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 5.66 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 10 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 567.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 -
DirectX 11 17 FPS -
DirectX 12 7 FPS -
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 194 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 43 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel UHD Graphics (16 EU)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 406
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 609
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 530
Face Detection (HP) 2153 951
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 1936
Text Classification (SP) 713 538
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 542
Object Detection (SP) 709 451
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 1237
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 5464
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel UHD Graphics (16 EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 May 10, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Mendocino Tiger Lake Xe
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above -
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225
- Intel Core i5 12450HX
- Intel Core i5 14450HX
- Intel Processor N95
- Intel Core i5 13450HX
- Intel Core i5 13500HX
- Intel Core i7 13650HX
- Intel Celeron N5095
- and 3 more
Laptop GPU ranking (125th and 144th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 350 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 750-1550 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 128
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 8
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 4
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 16
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 2 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 3-6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 6-12 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
0.2-0.4 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 6-15 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 122 mm² -
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
4 (80%)
1 (20%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!