AMD Radeon 660M vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 660M with 6 pipelines and 384 shaders against the 4 years and 1 month newer Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 256 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) over Radeon 660M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 660M
  • 15% higher maximum theoretical performance (1.5 vs 1.3 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 25% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (14K vs 11K)
  • Has 50% more shading units (384 vs 256)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
-
-
The Witcher 3
9
12
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
28
17
13
-
-
Far Cry 6
20
16
9
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
10
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
18
15
13
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
13
-
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
9
9
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
17
14
11
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 -
1080p Ultra 12 -
1440p Ultra 9 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1514 -
Solar Bay 6396 -
Port Royal 586 -
Fire Strike 4879 -
Wild Life Extreme 2676 -
Night Raid 18958 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 36 img/sec -
Face Detection 16.4 img/sec -
Horizon Detection 0.48 Gpixels/sec -
Edge Detection 0.65 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian Blur 0.53 Gpixels/sec -
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo Matching 46.5 Gpixels/sec -
Particle Physics 2056.5 FPS -
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 654 -
DirectX 11 47 FPS -
DirectX 12 23 FPS -
GPU Compute 1321 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 5 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 4 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1465 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 1706 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4266 -
Face Detection (HP) 5115 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 12992 -
Text Classification (SP) 1116 -
Machine Translation (HP) 1859 -
Object Detection (SP) 1574 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 6538 -
Style Transfer (SP) 26656 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 660M and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 1, 2022 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Celestial
GPU Codename Rembrandt Panther Lake
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 6600H or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 332 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 5 150
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 6650U
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
- Intel Core 5 315
- Intel Core 7 350
- Intel Core 5 320
- Intel Core Ultra 5 332
- Intel Core Ultra 5 322
Laptop GPU ranking (117th and 82nd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1800-1900 MHz (configurable) 2500 MHz
Shading Units 384 256
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 24 16
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 8
Compute Units (Pipelines) 6 4
Tensor Cores - 32
Ray-tracing Cores 6 2
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 GPixel/s 20 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTexel/s 40 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.4-1.5 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 5.0
TGP 15 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 3 nm
Die Size 208 mm² -
Transistor Count 13.1 billion -
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.2 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!