Radeon 760M vs Radeon 660M

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 760M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 1 year and 1 month older Radeon 660M that utilizes 6 pipelines and 384 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 660M over Radeon 760M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 760M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 53%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 93% higher maximum theoretical performance (2.9 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
  • Achieves 61% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (22K vs 14K)
  • Has 33% more shading units (512 vs 384)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
21
17
9
27
13
11
-
The Witcher 3
19
19
9
-
9
12
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
35
23
19
-
28
17
13
-
Far Cry 6
32
24
19
-
20
16
9
-
Hogwarts Legacy
15
12
-
-
10
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
24
17
10
18
15
13
-
Ghost of Tsushima
19
11
9
-
13
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
14
16
9
-
9
9
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
26
23
14
-
17
14
11
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 25 17
1080p Ultra 19 12
1440p Ultra 13 9
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
2056
Time Spy 2372 1514
Solar Bay 9378 6396
Port Royal 975 586
Fire Strike 7074 4879
Wild Life Extreme 4630 2676
Night Raid 29486 18958
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
22589
14065
Background Blur 57.8 img/sec 36 img/sec
Face Detection 28.7 img/sec 16.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec 0.48 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1 Gpixels/sec 0.65 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.82 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 85.4 Gpixels/sec 46.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2844.5 FPS 2056.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
5311
G2D Mark 890 654
DirectX 11 52 FPS 47 FPS
DirectX 12 25 FPS 23 FPS
GPU Compute 2838 Ops/s 1321 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2585 & 5 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Radeon 760M +156%
237.24
92.56
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 37 & 4 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
Radeon 760M +107%
8097
GB6 ML Half Precision
Radeon 760M +137%
11246
GB6 ML Quantized
Radeon 760M +102%
6004
Image Classification (SP) 3449 1465
Image Segmentation (HP) 4098 1706
Image Super Resolution (Q) 7937 4266
Face Detection (HP) 12168 5115
Pose Estimation (Q) 29915 12992
Text Classification (SP) 2571 1116
Machine Translation (HP) 3852 1859
Object Detection (SP) 2687 1574
Depth Estimation (Q) 14163 6538
Style Transfer (SP) 59966 26656
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 760M and Radeon 660M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 January 1, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.0 RDNA 2.0
GPU Codename Phoenix Rembrandt
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) -
Successor - Radeon 8040S - Radeon 8040S
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or above - AMD Ryzen 5 6600H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 5 230
- AMD Ryzen 5 240
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
- AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 150
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 6650U
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
Laptop GPU ranking (111th and 116th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 400 MHz
Boost Clock 2600-2800 MHz (configurable) 1800-1900 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 512 384
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 24
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 6
Ray-tracing Cores 6 6
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 42-45 GPixel/s 29-30 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 83-90 GTexel/s 43-46 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.7-2.9 TFLOPS
1.4-1.5 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 6 nm
Die Size 178 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor Count 25.4 billion 13.1 billion
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC - No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
20 (90.9%)
2 (9.1%)
Total votes: 22

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!