Tensor G2 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 16% better in floating-point computations
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~51%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2850 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1326K vs 1186K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1186373
A14 Bionic +12%
1326975
CPU 384056 364692
GPU 278383 311592
Memory 220709 180518
UX 303255 470169
Total score 1186373 1326975
Samples [54 tests] [55 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1461
A14 Bionic +43%
2095
Multi-Core Score
3867
A14 Bionic +37%
5297
Asset compression 149.9 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 99.9 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 110.2 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 74.2 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 105.5 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.7 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 35.1 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.26 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4715
A14 Bionic +257%
16822
Background blur 6.68 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 3.96 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.2 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.5 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 972.6 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 17 tests 17 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 702 -
Stability 78% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2767
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Section 1 - 13 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1821
A14 Bionic +22%
2229
Score 1821 2229
Stability 77% 86%
Graphics test 10 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10994
Web score 7923 -
Video editing score 6434 -
Data manipulation score 11061 -
Photo editing score 18842 -
Writing score 15053 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (shu-)AnTuTu 111126520
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Stelle)AnTuTu 111288870
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Kirillkryt)AnTuTu 111284629
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Ad_545)AnTuTu 111216748

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G2 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2850 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP7 Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 848 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 7 4
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 448 256
FLOPS 759.8 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300g -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2022 September 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS201 (S5P9855) APL1W01
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
204 (41.5%)
287 (58.5%)
Total votes: 491

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Tensor G2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!