Kirin 980 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core HiSilicon Kirin 980 (Mali-G76 MP10) with the newer 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 980
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Performs 67% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~56%)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 895K vs 736K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
736755
A12 Bionic +22%
895627
CPU 322481 309104
GPU 107109 144993
Memory 146249 139578
UX 160916 301952
Total score 736755 895627
Samples [37 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
928
A12 Bionic +42%
1318
Multi-Core Score
2875
3134
Asset compression 128.6 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 75 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 97.4 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 59.9 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 85.1 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.1 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 22.7 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.74 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 18 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
3657
A12 Bionic +115%
7868
Background blur 5.49 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 3.47 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 12.1 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 485.7 FPS 608.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 11 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
675
A12 Bionic +120%
1482
Score 675 1482
Stability 48% 65%
Graphics test 4 FPS 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7820 -
Video editing score 5774 -
Data manipulation score 7472 -
Photo editing score 14221 -
Writing score 10928 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 39 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[High]
-
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Techdude98)AnTuTu 12803419
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Eg0sh)AnTuTu 12757876
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Adiit)Geekbench 6 GPU4204
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (KiΓͺn 🐜)AnTuTu 11738484
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-25 (Mrhuh)AnTuTu 11752693
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU1344 / 4757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Π”ΠΈΠΌΠ°)AnTuTu 11644981
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 GPU7868
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386Geekbench 6 CPU1306 / 2770
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu 11756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 980 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2600 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 6.9 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP10 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 720 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 10 4
Shading units 24 64
Total shaders 240 256
FLOPS 345.6 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3120 x 1440 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAC‑LC
- AAX ΠΈ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HE‑AAC
- HE‑AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 1400 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced August 2018 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - APL1W81
Official page HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site -
Successor - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
622 (61.3%)
393 (38.7%)
Total votes: 1015

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Kirin 980, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!