Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 1200 vs Dimensity 1100 – what's better?

Dimensity 1200 vs Dimensity 1100

Dimensity 1200
VS
Dimensity 1100
Dimensity 1200
Dimensity 1100

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (with Mali-G77 MP9 graphics) and Dimensity 1100 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 1200
vs
Dimensity 1100

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 1200
960724
Dimensity 1100 +1%
974914
CPU 384772 339618
GPU 144433 134559
Memory 177452 192214
UX 254067 308523
Total score 960724 974914
Samples [12 tests] [21 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 168.6 MB/sec 156.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 95.8 pages/sec 94.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 131.1 Mpixels/sec 132.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 71.4 images/sec 70.6 images/sec
HDR 117.3 Mpixels/sec 108.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 9.93 images/sec
Photo processing 32.4 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.54 Mpixels/sec 4.27 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 48 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 6.87 images/sec 7.6 images/sec
Face detection 3.39 images/sec 3.87 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 14.4 Gpixels/sec 13.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 838.9 FPS 785.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 6 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 442 424
Stability 96% 97%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1311 1238
Stability 79% 99%
Graphics test 7 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Dimensity 1200 +19%
11728
Dimensity 1100
9881
Web score 9284 8025
Video editing score 6385 5755
Data manipulation score 10275 8321
Photo editing score 25491 23638
Writing score 14338 10916
Phones tested 2 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 68 FPS
[Ultra]		 58 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[High]		 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Low]		 27 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 71 FPS
[Ultra]		 68 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 88 FPS
[Ultra]		 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 51 FPS
[Ultra]		 48 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400		 Oppo Realme Q3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu 11960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu 11773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu 11961761
Add View all (21)
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (pitolartps_)AnTuTu 121115318
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (ε€©ηŽ‘1100)Geekbench 7 GPU3823
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (ε€©ηŽ‘1100)Geekbench 7 CPU656 / 2718
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (ε€©ηŽ‘1100)CPU Throttle75%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (pitol)AnTuTu 121073390
Add View all (25)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 1200 and Dimensity 1100

CPU

Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3000 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 32 KB 32 KB
L2 cache 320 KB 320 KB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4.3 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP9 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 886 MHz 836 MHz
Pipelines 9 9
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 288 288
FLOPS 510.3 Gigaflops 481.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance 4.5 TOPS 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Helio M70 Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2021 January 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6893 MT6891Z/CZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1100 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - MediaTek Dimensity 8020

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1461 (55.8%)
1157 (44.2%)
Total votes: 2618

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2. MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (22)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1100 and Dimensity 1200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
RTH July 25, 2025 at 12:59 AM
same ship with slight oc on 1200's gpu, 200mp support but 1100 is more stable and lte cat 21 vs cat 19 from 1200.. still 1100 is the better choice for me.
0 Reply
Avatar
Mbah Chiemerie Ejike January 1, 2023 at 11:40 PM
The Dimensity 1200 is a flagship chipset @nanoreview.
+34 Reply
Avatar
Sergey January 2, 2023 at 12:04 PM
Sorry, it's not flagship :)
+29 Reply
Avatar
Chiemerie January 3, 2023 at 01:36 PM
Sergey, The Dimensity 1100 and 1300 are flagships on your website so why is the 1200 not a flagship? And also MediaTek on their website classify it as their flagship chipset of 2021 to compete with the 888 and 870. Also, it contains complete flagship features as of 2021. It's basically the flagship of the Dimensity 1000 series after the 9000 and 8000 series.
+57 Reply
EnglishРусский