Dimensity 8100 vs Dimensity 8020
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (with Mali-G610 MP6 graphics) and Dimensity 8020 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
- Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
- Performs 37% better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
- 10% higher CPU clock speed (2850 vs 2600 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score β 1092K vs 981K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8020
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8100
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 408979 | 349209 |
| GPU | 172618 | 150375 |
| Memory | 201895 | 181946 |
| UX | 309113 | 299929 |
| Total score | 1092605 | 981459 |
| Samples | [52 tests] | [13 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 181.3 MB/sec | 172.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 108.3 pages/sec | 99.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 134.5 Mpixels/sec | 132.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 88.6 images/sec | 78.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 131.3 Mpixels/sec | 125.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 12.3 images/sec | 12.3 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 32.3 images/sec | 36.1 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.87 Mpixels/sec | 4.75 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 19 tests | 10 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 4.92 images/sec | 7.31 images/sec |
| Face detection | 2.66 images/sec | 3.47 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.23 Gpixels/sec | 0.22 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.26 Gpixels/sec | 0.32 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.18 Gpixels/sec | 0.22 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.06 Gpixels/sec | 0.07 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 9.79 Gpixels/sec | 13.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 849.5 FPS | 822.7 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Samples | 12 tests | 6 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 564 | 435 |
| Stability | 92% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 1540 | 1260 |
| Stability | 91% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11581 | 15979 |
| Video editing score | 7037 | 7875 |
| Data manipulation score | 8309 | 10609 |
| Photo editing score | 19759 | 46444 |
| Writing score | 16904 | 18299 |
| Phones tested | 6 models | Less than 3 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | 77 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Fortnite | 26 FPS [High] |
- |
| Shadowgun Legends | 74 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 98 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Genshin Impact | 57 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Device | OnePlus Ace 1080 x 2412 |
- |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Recent User Tests
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-07 (Gelu) | AnTuTu 11 | 1054060 |
| π 2026-09-05 (Zuma) | AnTuTu 11 | 1171695 |
| π 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia) | AnTuTu 11 | 1125997 |
| π 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq) | AnTuTu 11 | 1213935 |
| π 2026-07-09 -> Tem4k | AnTuTu 11 | 1120838 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8020
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-22 (GEKO973239) | AnTuTu 11 | 1022272 |
| π 2026-05-03 (Ren :3) | AnTuTu 11 | 1007624 |
| π 2026-04-29 (Ren :3) | AnTuTu 11 | 991321 |
| π 2026-04-15 (Poseidon) | AnTuTu 11 | 992657 |
| π 2026-03-05 (Otuab) | AnTuTu 11 | 947213 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8100 and Dimensity 8020CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.85 GHz β Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz β Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2850 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 320 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 6 W | 4 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G77 MP9 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 860 MHz | 836 MHz |
| Pipelines | 6 | 9 |
| Shading units | 64 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 384 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 660.5 Gigaflops | 481.5 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 580 | MediaTek APU 570 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s | 34.1 Gb/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 108MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | March 2022 | April 2023 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6895Z/TCZA | MT6891, MT6891Z_Z/CZA |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 official site |
| Successor | - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | - |
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
- There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 330
