Dimensity 8300 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6) with the older 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Performs 3.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 1326K
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 3100 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1604305
1326975
CPU 482670 364692
GPU 432750 311592
Memory 299238 180518
UX 389647 470169
Total score 1604305 1326975
Samples [103 tests] [55 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A14 Bionic +52%
2095
Multi-Core Score
A14 Bionic +26%
5297
Asset compression 174.4 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 128.6 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 146.7 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 93.5 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 136.1 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.2 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 37.6 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.97 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A14 Bionic +228%
16822
Background blur 16.5 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 9.4 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.7 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1671.3 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 27 tests 17 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 881 -
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
3688
2767
Score 3688 2767
Stability - 85%
Graphics test 14 FPS 11 FPS
Section 1 16 FPS 13 FPS
Section 2 14 FPS 10 FPS
Section 3 12 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
2768
2229
Score 2768 2229
Stability - 86%
Graphics test 16 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14649 -
Video editing score 6419 -
Data manipulation score 12555 -
Photo editing score 23328 -
Writing score 18403 -
Phones tested 2 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2CPU Throttle73%
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-11 (Fufufafa)AnTuTu 121778629
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-10 (Michael Angello)AnTuTu 121902415
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-08 (Michael Angello)AnTuTu 121797665
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-08 (Michael Angello)AnTuTu 121781486
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-08 (Shuvo)AnTuTu 111278519
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Barelpunch)AnTuTu 111200682
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Z0tacxyz)AnTuTu 111294739
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Timur)AnTuTu 111199214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (kudryash)AnTuTu 111196958

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8300 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3350 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP6 Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1400 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 6 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 2150.4 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced November 2023 September 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6897 APL1W01
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8500 - Apple A20 Pro
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
579 (76.6%)
177 (23.4%)
Total votes: 756

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Dimensity 8300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
OppoEXtra November 12, 2026 at 03:28 AM
A14 Bionic is decent but dated and runs way too hot now, whereas the 8300 is better optimized, staying just warm without thermal throttling.
0 Reply
Avatar
ProGuy? April 19, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Battle of Which is worth it? Unoptimised 2X ram and storage of device +40 percent performance Vs Super Optimised device But battery issues
+1 Reply
Avatar
Kidd August 10, 2024 at 11:38 AM
Dimensity 8300 should be above A14 Bionic @ Nanoreview. Make the correction
+37 Reply
Avatar
Adam April 2, 2024 at 05:32 PM
There are people who would, without hesitation, buy an iPhone 12 instead of a Poco X6 Pro. It's truly disappointing, but I'm not one of them. I always prioritize specifications over aesthetics. iPhones are just a trend to me.
+43 Reply
Avatar
Shaz April 13, 2024 at 11:28 AM
Yes, I agree with you. I currently have an iPhone 12 Pro Max. I actually plan on upgrading to the iPhone 13 Pro Max and aim to sell my iPhone 12 Pro Max. As for gaming, I find the Poco X6 Pro offers much better GPU performance than the A15 Bionic chip. So right now, I use my 12 Pro Max for daily tasks and the Poco X6 Pro for gaming.
+26 Reply
Avatar
kem November 8, 2024 at 10:41 AM
i agree the specs of x6 pro is higher than ip12 but the optimization of ios is another level so even iphone specs is below on android still ios is better in gaming due to fps stability
+6 Reply
Avatar
kem November 8, 2024 at 10:42 AM
we can’t deny that most games is more stable on ios
+10 Reply